|
Good morning, Joseph. Are we ready and Payson?
|
00:00:06
|
|
One more time.
|
00:00:10
|
|
Joseph We Ready and Payson.
|
00:00:12
|
|
Is that all?
|
00:00:16
|
|
Ohh, it's mine. Hang on.
|
00:00:19
|
|
I'm having a problem here.
|
00:00:23
|
|
Joseph, did I hear from you?
|
00:00:25
|
|
Hear me.
|
00:00:29
|
|
Yeah. OK. Good. Thank you.
|
00:00:29
|
|
Ohh dear.
|
00:00:34
|
|
Good morning, everyone.
|
00:00:37
|
|
Let me try and find the right piece of paperwork.
|
00:00:41
|
|
Time to begin.
|
00:00:44
|
|
Uh.
|
00:00:46
|
|
Today, October 24th, it's the 1001 probably I'd like to call to order our special meeting.
|
00:00:47
|
|
And.
|
00:00:55
|
|
Before we start, we'll have the Pledge of Allegiance.
|
00:00:58
|
|
Melissa, are you in the room?
|
00:01:03
|
|
No.
|
00:01:05
|
|
She knew I was gonna call her.
|
00:01:07
|
|
Sherry.
|
00:01:08
|
|
Share it with Julius and the Pledge, please.
|
00:01:10
|
|
To the flag of the United States of America.
|
00:01:16
|
|
Thank you very much.
|
00:01:19
|
|
One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
|
00:01:22
|
|
Thank you.
|
00:01:29
|
|
So before we get started with our items, I want to congratulate Micah Wheeler, who's with us here today. Stand up, so everybody
|
00:01:31
|
|
knows you.
|
00:01:35
|
|
Recently appointed Chief Deputy Assessor.
|
00:01:40
|
|
We needed to have that position filled and we're excited for you and.
|
00:01:44
|
|
Yeah, hopefully we can help you accomplish what needs to be done there, so.
|
00:01:49
|
|
Congratulations on that.
|
00:01:53
|
|
OK, so.
|
00:01:56
|
|
Item #2A is a public hearing information discussion action to convene a public hearing.
|
00:02:00
|
|
To hear from Citizens on the Fiscal Year 2023 Community Development Block Grant Application for Fiscal Year 2023.
|
00:02:06
|
|
And this CDBG regional account funding in the amount of $150,107.00.
|
00:02:14
|
|
Approve that application and adopt resolution #23-10-0223-10-0323-10-04 related to the CDBG application. And always a pleasure.
|
00:02:21
|
|
Kaylee Lathrop is with us.
|
00:02:30
|
|
Good morning, Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, this is just to vote on anything we've previously talked about in the first
|
00:02:40
|
|
public hearing, which was only housing rehabilitation to be the use of the funding for the CDBG grant.
|
00:02:46
|
|
Um, And then the attached resolutions have not changed from the last time they were adopted, with the exception of changing the
|
00:02:54
|
|
years.
|
00:02:57
|
|
And contract numbers.
|
00:03:01
|
|
Thank you, Kaylee. Any questions, Supervisor Humphrey?
|
00:03:05
|
|
I have no questions. Supervisor, client, I'm good as well. Thank you, Katie. And so am I. So with that then I'll close.
|
00:03:10
|
|
The discussion and open it up to public hearing.
|
00:03:17
|
|
Joseph, is anyone in pace and wish to speak on this item?
|
00:03:21
|
|
OK, Cassandra.
|
00:03:26
|
|
You know, and is there anyone here locally that would like to speak on it?
|
00:03:28
|
|
I'll say no. So I'll close the public hearing and I will entertain a motion.
|
00:03:33
|
|
Mr. Chair, I moved to.
|
00:03:41
|
|
Um, go forward with the physical year 2023?
|
00:03:44
|
|
CBDG Regional.
|
00:03:48
|
|
Account funding in the amount of $150,107.00.
|
00:03:51
|
|
And approve the CDB application.
|
00:03:57
|
|
And adopt Resolution Nos.
|
00:04:00
|
|
23-10 dash.
|
00:04:03
|
|
0223 Dash.
|
00:04:06
|
|
10-03 and 23-1 Dash.
|
00:04:08
|
|
04 related to the CDBG application, Mr. Chair. I'll second that. So we have a motion in a second to approve all those in favor,
|
00:04:13
|
|
say aye.
|
00:04:19
|
|
Motion unanimous. Thank you, Kaylee.
|
00:04:25
|
|
Item 3A.
|
00:04:27
|
|
Information and Discussion Action to authorize the Heela County Finance Department to accept an appropriation disbursement from
|
00:04:30
|
|
the State of Arizona for deputy and detention retention Funds and disperse.
|
00:04:36
|
|
To eligible Helix County Sheriff's officers employees in the amount of 5000 before taxes as defined by Arizona Department of
|
00:04:43
|
|
Administration agreement number.
|
00:04:48
|
|
That one. Yeah. DB FY23L22CH3130 four.
|
00:04:54
|
|
With Hella County Baron.
|
00:05:01
|
|
Good morning, Mr. Chair. Good morning, Supervisor Klein, Supervisor Humphrey.
|
00:05:04
|
|
This is the final installment of.
|
00:05:08
|
|
Retention and recruitment bonuses as designated by the Arizona Legislature, distributed through the Arizona Department of
|
00:05:12
|
|
Administration.
|
00:05:16
|
|
For a total of $10,000 for line level deputies and detention officers.
|
00:05:21
|
|
Ohh, that's the retention amount. The recruitment amount is.
|
00:05:26
|
|
Our 5000.
|
00:05:30
|
|
The 1st 3750 was included on the January 20th, 2023 payroll.
|
00:05:31
|
|
The next disbursement of 1250 was included on the May 12th payroll.
|
00:05:37
|
|
And if today's agenda item is approved?
|
00:05:43
|
|
Then the final disbursement will be in Friday's payroll, which will be in advance of the 1031.
|
00:05:46
|
|
Statutory deadline that the Legislature enacted this year.
|
00:05:54
|
|
We have a list of the eligible individuals and with your approval, we'll get that done for Friday.
|
00:05:59
|
|
OK, any questions for Mayor and Supervisor Humphrey?
|
00:06:07
|
|
I have no questions.
|
00:06:10
|
|
Supervisor Klein. Thank you, Mayor. This is good.
|
00:06:11
|
|
Yeah. Thank you, Mayor.
|
00:06:14
|
|
So I have no questions either, so I'll take a motion.
|
00:06:16
|
|
Mr. Chair, I'll make the motion to authorize HeLa County Finance Department to accept the appropriation disbursement of $5000.
|
00:06:20
|
|
For the Healing County Sheriff's Office employees.
|
00:06:27
|
|
Now second that, OK, we have a motion and a second to approve all those in favor, say aye, aye, aye.
|
00:06:32
|
|
Motion carries. Thank you. Thank you, Mayor.
|
00:06:39
|
|
Item 3B. Information Discussion Action to ratify the Board of Supervisors Approval to submit a social investment application.
|
00:06:43
|
|
To Resolution Copper Mining, LLC.
|
00:06:51
|
|
In the amount of $2000 on behalf of Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat, Inc.
|
00:06:54
|
|
Except the award of 2000 from Resolution Copper on behalf of Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat and approve a funding agreement
|
00:06:59
|
|
between Hill County and Resolution Copper and approve Economic Development Agreement number 10172023 and the amount of $2000
|
00:07:05
|
|
between Hill County and Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat Inc, all of which the Board has determined to be for the benefit of the
|
00:07:12
|
|
public. Mr. Menlough.
|
00:07:18
|
|
Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, thank you for the opportunity to present this item to you.
|
00:07:25
|
|
This is um.
|
00:07:30
|
|
A contribution or it's a contribution to the Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat?
|
00:07:32
|
|
Through the.
|
00:07:37
|
|
All the workings that we have to do.
|
00:07:38
|
|
Not found that it was easiest and best for resolution and for us to have that come to the county.
|
00:07:41
|
|
A contribution of $2000 come to the county and then we pass it through to Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat.
|
00:07:47
|
|
To do that it it is.
|
00:07:53
|
|
By statute and by our policy, a economic development grant to Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat.
|
00:07:55
|
|
So we ask you to ratify that.
|
00:08:02
|
|
These are from ball caps that we sold at the.
|
00:08:03
|
|
Gala that is happening on November 4th.
|
00:08:07
|
|
The end goal, I believe, is to use this to outfit a.
|
00:08:10
|
|
Our game room.
|
00:08:15
|
|
For veterans at the admin site.
|
00:08:16
|
|
With the Admin building at the Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat.
|
00:08:19
|
|
So I would ask for your approval of this Economic development grant that is for public purpose. Thank you, Mr. Manlove, Supervisor
|
00:08:22
|
|
Humphrey.
|
00:08:26
|
|
I have no question. Neither do I, and neither do I. So I'll entertain a motion.
|
00:08:30
|
|
Thank you, Chair. I make a motion to ratify the Board of Supervisors approval to submit a social investment application to.
|
00:08:36
|
|
Resolution Copper Mine, LLC Resolution Copper, in the amount of $2000 on behalf of the Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat,
|
00:08:44
|
|
Incorporated, accept the award of $2000.
|
00:08:50
|
|
From Resolution Copper on behalf of Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat, Incorporated.
|
00:08:58
|
|
Approve the funding agreement.
|
00:09:03
|
|
Between Healy County and Resolution Copper and approve economic development.
|
00:09:05
|
|
Agreement number 10172023.
|
00:09:10
|
|
In the amount of $2000 between Healey County.
|
00:09:14
|
|
And Pleasant Valley Veterans St. Incorporated, all of which the board has determined to be.
|
00:09:18
|
|
For the benefit of the public.
|
00:09:24
|
|
Thank you for that motion.
|
00:09:27
|
|
Do we have a second? I'll second it.
|
00:09:30
|
|
OK, we have a motion and a second to approve all those in favor. Say aye, aye, Aye.
|
00:09:32
|
|
Very good.
|
00:09:38
|
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Members Board. Thank you and OK, next item is yours as well. Item 3C, information discussion action to
|
00:09:39
|
|
ratify the Board of Supervisor approval to submit.
|
00:09:44
|
|
A grant application to APS.
|
00:09:50
|
|
Corporate.
|
00:09:53
|
|
Giving in the amount of $4500 on behalf of Pleasant Valley.
|
00:09:54
|
|
Veterans Retreat Inc.
|
00:09:58
|
|
And word.
|
00:10:00
|
|
Of $4500 from APS Corporate Giving on behalf of the Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat, Inc and Approved Economic Development
|
00:10:02
|
|
Agreement number 10182023 in the amount of $4500 between you, the county, and Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat, Inc, all of which
|
00:10:08
|
|
the Board has determined to be for the benefit of the public.
|
00:10:15
|
|
Mr. Manlove.
|
00:10:22
|
|
Mr. Chairman, Members for the Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat applied for funding from APS Corporate Giving to sponsor the PVR
|
00:10:23
|
|
fundraiser Violin November 4th. This course is the gala dinner that will be known for Ember 4th, held in pace and promising to be
|
00:10:29
|
|
the the event of the season.
|
00:10:35
|
|
And uh.
|
00:10:41
|
|
It'll be a great time for everybody.
|
00:10:43
|
|
The sponsorship includes audio, visual equipment and personnel to operate the equipment.
|
00:10:46
|
|
PVR has not been a nonprofit for three years and therefore Healey County applied for the funding.
|
00:10:51
|
|
The request today is to ratify the application to APS to accept the award in the amount of $4500 through funding agreement from
|
00:10:57
|
|
APS Corporate Giving and to approve an economic development agreement with PBR PVR to transfer funds.
|
00:11:04
|
|
To the nonprofit PVR.
|
00:11:11
|
|
I would.
|
00:11:15
|
|
Ask for your approval. Yeah. Thank you. Mr. Ben Larva, Supervisor Humphrey. Comments or questions? I have no questions. Hey
|
00:11:17
|
|
Supervisor Klein.
|
00:11:21
|
|
No, I'm good and I.
|
00:11:25
|
|
You know, it's really great. APS step on that which.
|
00:11:27
|
|
At our last meeting, I believe it was this. This was in the works they were trying. So I'm really glad to see they were able to do
|
00:11:30
|
|
it. Thank you. OK. Thank you, Supervisor. Thank you, Mr. Manlove. I have no questions, so I'll call for a motion.
|
00:11:36
|
|
Ohh, Mr. Chair, I'd make the motion to approve.
|
00:11:43
|
|
The submittal of grant application to Arizona Public Service Corporate giving the amount of $4500.
|
00:11:47
|
|
On behalf of Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat, Inc and accept the award of $4500 from APS Corporate.
|
00:11:53
|
|
Giving on behalf of Pleasant Valley veterans.
|
00:12:00
|
|
Ink.
|
00:12:03
|
|
And approve the Economic Development Agreement number 10182023 in the.
|
00:12:04
|
|
Amount of $4500, which the board is determined to be for the benefit of the public.
|
00:12:10
|
|
Mr. Chair, I'll second that so we have a motion to approve and a second all those in favor say aye, aye, aye.
|
00:12:16
|
|
Thank you Mr. Chair Members Board put a plug in for this event. It again will be a fabulous event.
|
00:12:24
|
|
Tickets are $100 and it's a very nice dinner that will be.
|
00:12:30
|
|
Ohh very.
|
00:12:35
|
|
It's worth our time and effort to.
|
00:12:38
|
|
Do this major fundraiser for Pleasant Valley Veterans chief so that services.
|
00:12:40
|
|
And deliverables can be made to the veterans of Arizona and throughout the country.
|
00:12:45
|
|
So I hope that you can go to the Pleasant Valley Veterans Retreat website.
|
00:12:50
|
|
To buy tickets, there's a link to go through there and get your tickets, so please sign up and.
|
00:12:54
|
|
Was also each other at the event, Yeah, and that's coming up. So, James, do you know how many tickets are still available?
|
00:13:01
|
|
There's probably.
|
00:13:07
|
|
60 or 70?
|
00:13:09
|
|
OK. The total of 168 tickets, I believe there will be sold.
|
00:13:11
|
|
And so there's somewhere in that neighborhood of tickets that are so there's a few available.
|
00:13:16
|
|
Yeah, good. And let's get everyone of them sold.
|
00:13:21
|
|
About a week and a half away. Yes, on Saturday evening.
|
00:13:24
|
|
All right.
|
00:13:27
|
|
And thank you Mr. Chair Members Board for allowing us to have these routine, not, I guess not routine, but these.
|
00:13:27
|
|
Issues on our work session today this is these are time sensitive as you can see with all of them, so appreciate it. Yes, you
|
00:13:34
|
|
indulge in staff to be able to have these.
|
00:13:39
|
|
Hear these things to supervise the client. Did you have something to add?
|
00:13:44
|
|
Not with James, but Sherry won't you scoot over about two chairs so that light of buggy doesn't fall out?
|
00:13:47
|
|
That really could cause a problem today.
|
00:13:55
|
|
That would.
|
00:13:57
|
|
Well, that's good. We have facilities sitting in the crowd so they know where to go when they get done with this meeting.
|
00:14:00
|
|
OK, I'm good.
|
00:14:09
|
|
Ohh yeah Christina, you might wanna move too.
|
00:14:11
|
|
Ohh, that thing could fly around a little bit, so OK.
|
00:14:15
|
|
Alright, thank you for that.
|
00:14:18
|
|
So we're going to move on to.
|
00:14:20
|
|
Item 3D Information and discussion regarding properties owned or held by Heela County.
|
00:14:23
|
|
Mr. O'Driscoll, Morning Chairman, Members of the Board.
|
00:14:30
|
|
If you recall, several months ago, the board directed staff to come up with a list of.
|
00:14:33
|
|
The properties that Heela County owns.
|
00:14:38
|
|
And so that's what we're here to present to the board. We've done a comprehensive.
|
00:14:41
|
|
Study of where they're, where they're at the location.
|
00:14:48
|
|
The assessed value.
|
00:14:53
|
|
And pictures of all these properties. So I want to give a shout out to Tom Holman and Selena Kates.
|
00:14:55
|
|
Who did most of the legwork and other staff actually went out to these properties to get eyes on the property.
|
00:15:01
|
|
So we can give you a very comprehensive view of where these properties are and what type of properties, in other words.
|
00:15:07
|
|
You'll see during the presentation we have some properties that are just drainage areas.
|
00:15:14
|
|
Really aren't worth much, but but we also own properties that have structures on them as well, so.
|
00:15:18
|
|
I'd like to invite Tom Holman up to begin the presentation.
|
00:15:25
|
|
Good morning, Mr. Chairman, members of the Board. Hey, morning. Hopefully we don't turn this into four hours, but you know with
|
00:15:31
|
|
103 separate properties it may.
|
00:15:35
|
|
May go that way depending on your questions.
|
00:15:40
|
|
Um.
|
00:15:42
|
|
You know as as earlier looked at.
|
00:15:43
|
|
You know, we went through and identified all the properties that were owned by the county, 103 of them.
|
00:15:47
|
|
And um, this presentation, I believe, breaks down by district, so we'll be working.
|
00:15:52
|
|
Through each district.
|
00:15:58
|
|
And you know, as Mr. Driscoll mentioned, there are.
|
00:15:59
|
|
A number of options, some of them.
|
00:16:05
|
|
OK, we're just going to accept them.
|
00:16:07
|
|
Others may.
|
00:16:09
|
|
You know, we may need to research for taking action, like it may might make sense to split properties or something so we retain
|
00:16:11
|
|
the roadway.
|
00:16:15
|
|
And travel ways but.
|
00:16:19
|
|
Sell off additional land, but those will be.
|
00:16:21
|
|
You know, a separate.
|
00:16:24
|
|
Individual item.
|
00:16:25
|
|
So.
|
00:16:28
|
|
Let's see how this goes.
|
00:16:28
|
|
We we see them.
|
00:16:32
|
|
Through.
|
00:16:34
|
|
Various um.
|
00:16:35
|
|
So starting out in District 1.
|
00:16:38
|
|
These these are kind of hard to see. This is the.
|
00:16:44
|
|
Property adjacent.
|
00:16:49
|
|
To the.
|
00:16:50
|
|
Community College district. It's on a hill.
|
00:16:52
|
|
I know there are various things that have been.
|
00:16:55
|
|
Asked for about it.
|
00:16:57
|
|
Of.
|
00:17:00
|
|
I don't know if there's any consideration that it could be sold.
|
00:17:02
|
|
So sorry, I'm trying to stay.
|
00:17:07
|
|
My notes are organized by the parcel number.
|
00:17:11
|
|
So any notes you provide to me, I wanted to be able to.
|
00:17:14
|
|
Write down.
|
00:17:18
|
|
Three or 401369 D There it is.
|
00:17:21
|
|
I know there's been discussion to have further development on that.
|
00:17:27
|
|
But don't know if you have any guidance.
|
00:17:31
|
|
Or if you can eat for Nanzer questions on that.
|
00:17:35
|
|
OK, the supervisor, Humphrey, any questions on this parcel?
|
00:17:39
|
|
I I I have a lot of questions but I'm I'm gonna hold them OK you know we could get into this one property for an hour. It's tough
|
00:17:44
|
|
that's do it but I you know it's it's just sitting there so so maybe at some point in time we need to just pick out particular
|
00:17:50
|
|
properties and have a work session.
|
00:17:55
|
|
On those particular properties.
|
00:18:01
|
|
We've got a long agenda today. Just just.
|
00:18:03
|
|
Just me thinking, you know, we we've got a lot on our plate today.
|
00:18:06
|
|
And we we could get into this for.
|
00:18:10
|
|
Half a day by itself. So if I was to, I'm gonna, I'm gonna leave it, Mr. Chair. So.
|
00:18:13
|
|
OK, if I was to make a wild guess, this is probably the top of the list of this 103 properties is this particular property.
|
00:18:18
|
|
My guess is we're going to see a lot of little wedge shape hillside steep stuff that is going to be kind of whatever, but.
|
00:18:26
|
|
But this 20 acres has been a center of my thoughts for quite a while. It's been sitting there.
|
00:18:35
|
|
And you know and I know we've in the past years that we've been on the board, we've it's come across our.
|
00:18:42
|
|
Our deal couple times, but to really sit down and and and look into this is something I think we need to do.
|
00:18:50
|
|
And really discuss where we're going ahead with this particular piece.
|
00:18:57
|
|
A property. My thoughts are that if we had.
|
00:19:01
|
|
Had any inkling of selling it? We kind of missed our boat about two years ago.
|
00:19:04
|
|
Because property prices.
|
00:19:09
|
|
Or just sworn.
|
00:19:11
|
|
Has not that they still aren't, but since then I know James, you've come up with an idea, a different idea or two on this.
|
00:19:12
|
|
Particular.
|
00:19:20
|
|
A piece of property, so.
|
00:19:21
|
|
I'm afraid to talk about it. I'm just saying.
|
00:19:25
|
|
That's all good. I you know that that's that's the neat thing about these meetings and.
|
00:19:29
|
|
Advisors and excuse me, Michael, we can talk in generalities about it. I think we all understand where it is, how much it is,
|
00:19:35
|
|
what, what this is a property that's on the top of all of our minds.
|
00:19:40
|
|
And it probably has the most options as far as what we do. And I know the town of Payson has some plans.
|
00:19:45
|
|
That they want to build a pool and rec center. They want to talk to us about part of this property. So I know that's a potential
|
00:19:53
|
|
they town of Payson actually owns about an acre right in the center of it.
|
00:19:59
|
|
I don't know why, but they do.
|
00:20:06
|
|
And.
|
00:20:08
|
|
There's discussions about workforce housing.
|
00:20:10
|
|
And all of those things. So there's a lot of options with this property and maybe Supervisor Humphrey is correct, we can identify
|
00:20:13
|
|
this.
|
00:20:16
|
|
Particular discussion to a wider, larger meeting going forward if we want to so.
|
00:20:20
|
|
But I also respect supervisor client. I don't know that we're gonna be able to.
|
00:20:28
|
|
Hammer it all out in one.
|
00:20:31
|
|
Meeting this meeting.
|
00:20:34
|
|
Yeah, Chairman, members of the board, I recognize that this property is a large topic conversation.
|
00:20:37
|
|
And if I may recommend for this particular property, I talked with County Manager Mr. Men Love and bring this at some point time
|
00:20:43
|
|
in the future just this property.
|
00:20:47
|
|
In front of the board for further discussion.
|
00:20:51
|
|
Because this has been talked about for several years now.
|
00:20:54
|
|
There's a lot of different.
|
00:20:57
|
|
People that are talking to other people about this. So we sort of need a little bit of time to get everybody in the same room and
|
00:20:58
|
|
have a discussion about it. So I don't.
|
00:21:03
|
|
I for one don't have a issue with doing that.
|
00:21:09
|
|
But things around here seem to get kicked down the road quite a ways and that road needs to be shortened up a whole lot. So I'm
|
00:21:12
|
|
thinking that if if we want to do that, then we need to set something up very soon and maybe pull like.
|
00:21:19
|
|
Whoever from the town that may be interested in talking about it with us and whoever else.
|
00:21:26
|
|
Umm.
|
00:21:32
|
|
But we discussed this piece of property.
|
00:21:33
|
|
Because all it is doing is sitting there.
|
00:21:35
|
|
Watching traffic go by SO.
|
00:21:38
|
|
I don't have a problem with that. I don't have a problem with doing it today in this work session. More or less it's a work
|
00:21:41
|
|
session, even though it's special meeting too.
|
00:21:45
|
|
So however you guys wanna do it, but I do not want to go another year with that property not being addressed. That's my opinion.
|
00:21:49
|
|
Supervisor guarantee it won't be nothing. You know me.
|
00:21:53
|
|
So I have faith in you, Michael, and this is purified.
|
00:21:58
|
|
If I might bring one thing up to public works.
|
00:22:03
|
|
We're always looking for Rd. material, and so are other people.
|
00:22:06
|
|
And that's Granite, correct?
|
00:22:10
|
|
And so I'm wondering, why? Why don't we start leveling that and use some of the material until we decide what we're gonna do with
|
00:22:13
|
|
it? Because it'd be worth more flat than it would be the way it is, and there's an awful lot of Rd. material there.
|
00:22:19
|
|
That uh.
|
00:22:25
|
|
We're we're always looking for material and we own 20 acres of granite, so.
|
00:22:27
|
|
Anyway.
|
00:22:32
|
|
Just something to bring up to public works while we're trying to decide.
|
00:22:33
|
|
Let's use some of our dirt.
|
00:22:37
|
|
Thank you, Mr. Chair. You're welcome. Thank you.
|
00:22:40
|
|
So is that enough of a direction right now or do we wanna talk some more about this property?
|
00:22:43
|
|
Chairman, Supervisors. That's up.
|
00:22:49
|
|
To you.
|
00:22:51
|
|
But you've given me clear directions on how to proceed with this particular property in a very.
|
00:22:52
|
|
Our quick manner. Let's reach out to the town and see if we can pull together a meeting in the near future.
|
00:22:58
|
|
To discuss this particular property.
|
00:23:03
|
|
Absolutely. And what we want to do with it? Great. Thank you.
|
00:23:06
|
|
OK, go ahead.
|
00:23:09
|
|
Alright.
|
00:23:10
|
|
So open with a.
|
00:23:11
|
|
Bombshell.
|
00:23:13
|
|
Good one.
|
00:23:15
|
|
Umm.
|
00:23:16
|
|
This property is um.
|
00:23:17
|
|
Again.
|
00:23:21
|
|
Another one of our vacant ones.
|
00:23:23
|
|
It's down.
|
00:23:26
|
|
Trying to think this this is more a drainage. It's very close to Tunnel Creek.
|
00:23:29
|
|
It's actually down in Garcia.
|
00:23:34
|
|
So District 2 this should be.
|
00:23:37
|
|
Go see Liz District 2 if that's OK.
|
00:23:41
|
|
Right.
|
00:23:47
|
|
OK. That may be in two.
|
00:23:49
|
|
All right. There were that, Tom, that's actually Tunnel Creek, that stretch of green tree, Yeah, that you can see in the upper
|
00:23:52
|
|
right image, basically the.
|
00:23:57
|
|
Copes of trees.
|
00:24:02
|
|
You know it's a water feature.
|
00:24:04
|
|
That has.
|
00:24:07
|
|
Ohh.
|
00:24:09
|
|
Drainage implications?
|
00:24:10
|
|
I am 1240. Who?
|
00:24:12
|
|
Tim, do you know who would or be neighbors to that property?
|
00:24:14
|
|
Well, I I don't know who would be neighbors to that property, but that was one of my suggestions. Down the road is a lot of these
|
00:24:19
|
|
are corner pieces, a lot of these are hills. A lot of these are part of a Creek.
|
00:24:25
|
|
But they do have adjacent property owners.
|
00:24:30
|
|
And so, you know, just a question down the road is talking to some of these adjacent property owners.
|
00:24:33
|
|
To see if they would be willing to add some of this to their property. And yeah, it's in a drainage, but I mean, if you've got a
|
00:24:40
|
|
few cows and goats on it, why not fence it?
|
00:24:45
|
|
And and and use it. I mean it it it does have a purpose so.
|
00:24:50
|
|
That you know for a lot of these hillsides and a lot of these properties that you can't put a structure on.
|
00:24:54
|
|
I I know if I was in an adjacent property and and they wanted to give me a little more property for a reasonable cost, I I would
|
00:25:00
|
|
take that because they're not making any more dirt and if you're in a real place like this.
|
00:25:06
|
|
You ought to have an animal. There's pretty good and that just gives them more runs. So, Mr. Chair, let me ask Jessica question
|
00:25:13
|
|
and make sure I got my figures right. Jeff sitting there too. Correct me if I'm wrong, but.
|
00:25:17
|
|
To take it like a piece of this, of this property right here and sell it to a neighbor, it has to be at 90% of its value. Is that
|
00:25:23
|
|
correct?
|
00:25:27
|
|
Assessed Value? Assessed Value, Yes.
|
00:25:33
|
|
Well.
|
00:25:36
|
|
Fair market, it's going to be the fair market value, OK, But you're in the road, OK.
|
00:25:37
|
|
Selling property.
|
00:25:43
|
|
Which when you look at something like this, though I would think that this cannot be worth much sitting in the middle of Tunnel
|
00:25:47
|
|
Creek.
|
00:25:50
|
|
I I would think that would be up to the appraiser, but I agree with you, yeah.
|
00:25:54
|
|
And and just for context, I got on the right page on my notes. We acquired this in 1991 for flood control purposes.
|
00:25:59
|
|
We we acquired it. We acquired it via quick claim in 1991.
|
00:26:07
|
|
And we've never because it's in. It's in a flood.
|
00:26:12
|
|
And and and we we got that probably because it went to a tax lien sale and didn't sell quite post so we bought it for a dollar. I
|
00:26:17
|
|
I didn't look deeper into the actual yeah so I mean a property like that we buy for like a dollar.
|
00:26:23
|
|
Yeah, and it and so to me that would be the appraised value of it. But yeah, but that would be up to the appraiser, which would
|
00:26:29
|
|
make it reasonable for someone to.
|
00:26:33
|
|
To have so.
|
00:26:38
|
|
But this is another one of those crazy things to me, Mr. Chair. Is that.
|
00:26:41
|
|
We're looking at .32.
|
00:26:45
|
|
1/3 of an acre basically on this.
|
00:26:47
|
|
It has no value to us for flood control or anything else. I mean that is it right or is there other properties adjacent to this
|
00:26:50
|
|
we're not seeing yet?
|
00:26:54
|
|
Mr. Chair, members of the board, you'll see during the presentation.
|
00:27:00
|
|
There are several properties that we've acquired through FEMA grants for flood mitigation.
|
00:27:03
|
|
And those properties are specifically we purchased from homeowners that had had had repeated.
|
00:27:09
|
|
Floods onto their homes.
|
00:27:15
|
|
So we've acquired that through a grant property and those have to be kept as far as vacant basically those properties since it was
|
00:27:17
|
|
purchased with federal grant money.
|
00:27:21
|
|
And for the purpose of making sure that nobody ever builds there since the the home that was.
|
00:27:27
|
|
On that property was repeatedly flooded out and damaged. So like this piece of property and then Michael you're saying we have to
|
00:27:32
|
|
keep it? No, there's there's two different classifications. We've purchased properties for flood mitigation purposes.
|
00:27:39
|
|
And then we've also purchased land through FEMA grants for flood mitigation purposes.
|
00:27:46
|
|
I believe this is not one that purchased through FEMA, correct?
|
00:27:51
|
|
So.
|
00:27:55
|
|
So we can't. So the board can decide.
|
00:27:56
|
|
To choose to get this appraised and sell it if they so choose the FEMA properties.
|
00:27:59
|
|
Those have to stay vacant and we cannot sell those.
|
00:28:05
|
|
Are they going to be on this list? Are we gonna see and you guys know which ones are what? Correct. OK.
|
00:28:08
|
|
Mr. Chair, just real quick, if if, if we have properties for flood mitigation that we have to keep.
|
00:28:14
|
|
As flood mitigation.
|
00:28:22
|
|
And we can't do anything with them.
|
00:28:25
|
|
Could do we know the difference today so that we don't have to discuss those properties, they're just.
|
00:28:27
|
|
They're just something that we have to keep. We can't do anything with and can spend more time with the properties that we can do
|
00:28:33
|
|
something with.
|
00:28:37
|
|
Chairman Members of the board, yes, we do know those properties that are FEMA owned. I mean it it. Yeah, I.
|
00:28:42
|
|
I personally, Mr. Chair, I'm interested in properties that that we can do something with to help an adjoining property or or or
|
00:28:48
|
|
someone that wants to invest in the property rather than go through properties that that we have like in some of my district where
|
00:28:54
|
|
we bought, you know.
|
00:28:59
|
|
FEMA, where we bought money, property from people.
|
00:29:05
|
|
We can't do anything with it, so I just sent.
|
00:29:10
|
|
Leave it as it is. Yeah, I think we can do that, right?
|
00:29:13
|
|
Yeah, we we can. That'll skip a few.
|
00:29:16
|
|
OK.
|
00:29:20
|
|
So.
|
00:29:21
|
|
So.
|
00:29:22
|
|
Do we have a any direction for Tom on this particular piece of property?
|
00:29:23
|
|
It sounds like we're able to sell this one, but we don't need it for flood mitigation.
|
00:29:30
|
|
Should we have it appraised?
|
00:29:35
|
|
And.
|
00:29:39
|
|
Move forward with this property for sale.
|
00:29:41
|
|
Mr. Chair, while you're thinking on your thoughts and I throw something out here real quick because we're just getting started, So
|
00:29:45
|
|
I think there's gonna be, I would expect to see a lot of properties here we may have the option of.
|
00:29:49
|
|
Of selling. So maybe by the end of our meeting when it's over with we can talk about someone we can get to do the the market
|
00:29:55
|
|
values of these.
|
00:30:00
|
|
Well, one thing. I was Mr. Chair, if I may, one thing I was thinking is.
|
00:30:05
|
|
Once we've identified the properties that can be sold, I think to have them all appraised would be quite, quite expensive, but if
|
00:30:10
|
|
we knew the ones that could be for sale.
|
00:30:15
|
|
And and and notified the public that these are for.
|
00:30:22
|
|
Then we could have them appraised as we have interested parties.
|
00:30:26
|
|
For a value.
|
00:30:31
|
|
Because if we if we appraise all of these appraisals is only good for like 6 months or a year or something.
|
00:30:32
|
|
So if they do an appraisal that it's not gonna be good point ever.
|
00:30:37
|
|
So I would think if we knew the ones that were for sale, we need to let everyone know that we have these properties that that they
|
00:30:41
|
|
can obtain.
|
00:30:45
|
|
And then go forward with an appraisal for for cost.
|
00:30:50
|
|
Mr. Chair, members of the Board, may I make a suggestion that during this presentation just let Tom and myself know which
|
00:30:55
|
|
properties you'd like further investigation.
|
00:31:00
|
|
And what I'll do is I'll send staff out there.
|
00:31:05
|
|
And do a walk through the property to see what's around each property.
|
00:31:08
|
|
And make it determine and come back to the board and make a determination whether this property.
|
00:31:13
|
|
Possibly could be sold or whether this property is, you know is right directly in the flood zone floodplain and may not be a good
|
00:31:18
|
|
idea to sell that or consider selling that because there are properties on here that are ditches and things like that. So those
|
00:31:23
|
|
will go fairly quickly. We wouldn't be able to.
|
00:31:29
|
|
I mean sell those and things like that, but if if you want to proceed with that in mind, we could do that absolutely.
|
00:31:34
|
|
OK, let's pin this property as possible for that.
|
00:31:42
|
|
OK, further investigation and yeah. And then, if I may, Mr. Chair.
|
00:31:44
|
|
As we go through properties with with neighbors, I would think would be.
|
00:31:49
|
|
Important properties.
|
00:31:55
|
|
Because then we can contact their neighbors and say hey.
|
00:31:57
|
|
You know you've got.
|
00:32:00
|
|
Something right next to you that that you can have.
|
00:32:02
|
|
If you if you wish.
|
00:32:06
|
|
And so I would say if if there's no, if there, if it's in a, if it's in the middle of a Creek and there's no neighbors by.
|
00:32:08
|
|
Are they selling? That's pretty pretty slim.
|
00:32:14
|
|
I I don't. I don't know, Mr. Chair. I would imagine. I think that's a good point, Tim. And I would imagine there's gonna be some
|
00:32:18
|
|
people that would look at that being a neighbor and say, yeah, I could turn my goats out in there or whatever. And some people are
|
00:32:23
|
|
pregnant and say, no, I don't want the extra land that I'm going to be paying taxes on that I can't use. So I think we're gonna
|
00:32:28
|
|
have a mixed bag. But I think that's a I think that's a good way going.
|
00:32:33
|
|
OK.
|
00:32:39
|
|
You know, so Tom.
|
00:32:40
|
|
I think what I'm hearing is if we can filter the list. So what we asked you to do several months ago was identify all county
|
00:32:42
|
|
properties.
|
00:32:46
|
|
But for today's purposes, it sounds like what we want to do is only identify properties that we really have any discussion on at
|
00:32:50
|
|
all. If it's a female property, we can't sell it, or it's a property we own that must be kept.
|
00:32:57
|
|
For various reasons then, there's really no discussion there, so we only want to look at the ones where we would have.
|
00:33:04
|
|
Options.
|
00:33:13
|
|
OK. That sounds good.
|
00:33:14
|
|
We will see what we can do, OK?
|
00:33:16
|
|
Another one.
|
00:33:19
|
|
116 eight.
|
00:33:22
|
|
Sorry, I'm going to have to bounce back and forth between my notes here.
|
00:33:25
|
|
And of course, they're not.
|
00:33:30
|
|
In order.
|
00:33:31
|
|
I didn't try to memorize 103, but the status of 103 properties, sorry.
|
00:33:34
|
|
3/02/14 OK, back at one page. There it is.
|
00:33:41
|
|
This is a portion of Muncie Drive we are currently evaluating it for.
|
00:33:46
|
|
Right away Access. That's what it's currently being used for.
|
00:33:52
|
|
The original Rd. was.
|
00:33:55
|
|
You can see on the original Rd.
|
00:33:58
|
|
The decline right away with fear, but probably due to a hill.
|
00:34:00
|
|
The actual Rd.
|
00:34:06
|
|
Is slightly off from that.
|
00:34:08
|
|
OK.
|
00:34:10
|
|
Again, a right away.
|
00:34:13
|
|
Um.
|
00:34:16
|
|
Issue on.
|
00:34:17
|
|
16.
|
00:34:18
|
|
This is in whispering Pines.
|
00:34:19
|
|
For that's a long Houston Mesa Rd.
|
00:34:22
|
|
So part of the parcel was sticking out into defined right away, so we acquired it.
|
00:34:25
|
|
Sometime previous.
|
00:34:31
|
|
In again in 91.
|
00:34:33
|
|
To perfect the right of way for public road right and and.
|
00:34:35
|
|
Mr. Chair, if I may, I would say right away.
|
00:34:39
|
|
Would be.
|
00:34:43
|
|
Some of those that we don't need to worry about because we're probably not going to do anything with them because people are using
|
00:34:44
|
|
them to drive on. Yeah, we if if if we sold them to that corner property right there, we fence it in and we we'd really.
|
00:34:50
|
|
Get you and agree with you, but I've got to go back to my notes. So yeah, I end up stalling for each one. I would say going
|
00:34:58
|
|
forward that's probably not one we're going to do anything without or any that are roadway.
|
00:35:04
|
|
Right, right. Again, more Houston Mesa Rd. right away. OK.
|
00:35:09
|
|
Right.
|
00:35:13
|
|
This one again. You can see there Neil Drive in Whispering Pines.
|
00:35:15
|
|
The road was defined one way by the subdivision, but reality became a a slightly different route.
|
00:35:21
|
|
OK.
|
00:35:29
|
|
So let me ask you something on on that. So when you take these little pieces like we're looking at it for right of ways and I
|
00:35:30
|
|
agree with with Supervisor Humphrey.
|
00:35:34
|
|
So eventually we're going to work our way through those to where they just become part of the right of way. Is that is that
|
00:35:38
|
|
correct?
|
00:35:41
|
|
Or the existing right away is going through that property. Again, this was one of another one of those properties that was
|
00:35:44
|
|
acquired in.
|
00:35:48
|
|
1991.
|
00:35:52
|
|
1040.
|
00:35:54
|
|
Sorry, this was most acquired last year in 22.
|
00:35:56
|
|
It's a portion of Neil Drive and.
|
00:36:01
|
|
Scott Drive.
|
00:36:03
|
|
Again to perfect the right away.
|
00:36:04
|
|
I I saw I I've just.
|
00:36:07
|
|
In my mind, what I'm really thinking is there's a way we can clean up this huge list eventually.
|
00:36:09
|
|
And get it off the county plate. So when it comes to little bits and pieces of this, this dirt like this.
|
00:36:14
|
|
Is there a way of just just?
|
00:36:22
|
|
Somehow adding it to the right way and saying this is it and taking it off our plate and and erase it or is it against?
|
00:36:24
|
|
Is that something that future county supervisors are going to deal with as we are?
|
00:36:31
|
|
Probably a little bit of both. OK, How can we make it to where they don't deal with it?
|
00:36:36
|
|
I would have to check with.
|
00:36:41
|
|
Scott Warren Uh-huh. To to understand fully.
|
00:36:43
|
|
What the mechanism is, I'm not sure the.
|
00:36:47
|
|
I know it can be done, but I'm not sure of the legal mechanism, so I don't want to speak out of turn ohh start speaking if it's
|
00:36:50
|
|
wrong. Jessica holler so.
|
00:36:53
|
|
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
|
00:36:57
|
|
So apparently we can't use the right way that was originally.
|
00:36:59
|
|
A portion for that.
|
00:37:04
|
|
For it.
|
00:37:06
|
|
It's just too steep, or it's a ditch, or it's a whatever it is, it's so odd to me.
|
00:37:06
|
|
That.
|
00:37:12
|
|
Well, no, it's not really that odd, but.
|
00:37:13
|
|
Back in the day, they just said, well, let's just cut across this property and do it there.
|
00:37:16
|
|
Right. And if we purchase that for?
|
00:37:21
|
|
Purposes right away.
|
00:37:23
|
|
Could we take that existing right away?
|
00:37:25
|
|
Abandon it for sale.
|
00:37:28
|
|
Don't know, dude, the property owner.
|
00:37:32
|
|
To to the adjacent that's using it, yeah.
|
00:37:34
|
|
Yeah, it looks like there's a vehicle parked there to me. Yeah, looks like he's using it.
|
00:37:37
|
|
OK. Thank you, Tom.
|
00:37:42
|
|
Moving on 2261.
|
00:37:50
|
|
This is a portion of Mountain View Terrace that we currently maintained. It was quick claim to the county in 74.
|
00:37:56
|
|
So.
|
00:38:03
|
|
Um.
|
00:38:04
|
|
It's.
|
00:38:07
|
|
A road that we maintain.
|
00:38:08
|
|
So again, that may qualify to convert it to a fee or something else.
|
00:38:10
|
|
But we would have to look at that.
|
00:38:15
|
|
Uh.
|
00:38:18
|
|
I always have a problem pronouncing this.
|
00:38:21
|
|
Again, it's a right away perfection in Mesa del Caballo.
|
00:38:23
|
|
There's.
|
00:38:31
|
|
A whole bunch of this this is happens to be on Stallion Road.
|
00:38:32
|
|
This 1F.
|
00:38:37
|
|
Is.
|
00:38:38
|
|
Again.
|
00:38:41
|
|
Right away 36 that's the.
|
00:38:42
|
|
Forest Service Rd. between Jakes Corner and Rye.
|
00:38:47
|
|
Uh, currently going through um.
|
00:38:51
|
|
The number of parcels.
|
00:38:55
|
|
If I could get on my right page, I'd be happy.
|
00:38:58
|
|
And what kind of acres are we talking about there, Tom? That one is 2.1 acres basically for service 184.
|
00:39:01
|
|
Uh.
|
00:39:10
|
|
It was stuff that was abandoned after the.
|
00:39:11
|
|
Minor land division.
|
00:39:13
|
|
Stuff that was remaining.
|
00:39:16
|
|
The actual Rd. itself.
|
00:39:17
|
|
I.
|
00:39:19
|
|
Mr. Chair, I don't, I'm not understanding when you're throwing in Forced Service Road 184 either. I mean is is this?
|
00:39:20
|
|
This is actually a part of the Forest Service Road 184, yes?
|
00:39:27
|
|
Is it that green strip that it's that skinny green strip that goes through the private?
|
00:39:33
|
|
Forest Service 184.
|
00:39:39
|
|
Goes N out of Jake's corner and connects at the Guy Stealer Road, right?
|
00:39:41
|
|
Yeah, I'm familiar with the road.
|
00:39:46
|
|
And so.
|
00:39:49
|
|
The Forest Service Rd. is separate from the property that we own, yes, in through the Minor Land Division process.
|
00:39:50
|
|
Um.
|
00:39:58
|
|
That was the chunk that was leftover.
|
00:39:59
|
|
Um.
|
00:40:02
|
|
3 or 436?
|
00:40:04
|
|
1/2 and we.
|
00:40:07
|
|
Actually acquired it in 2022.
|
00:40:10
|
|
That's right away.
|
00:40:16
|
|
So.
|
00:40:17
|
|
Mr. Chair Tom this.
|
00:40:18
|
|
This two point whatever acres is strung out for how long along that road I I don't have a linear.
|
00:40:20
|
|
Measurement also gave us the acres on here.
|
00:40:27
|
|
I know that road is used quite a bit. Sure, yeah.
|
00:40:32
|
|
And and so.
|
00:40:37
|
|
I don't know how we own a Forest Service Rd. but if they do.
|
00:40:40
|
|
Well, it may be that we maintain that, I know that.
|
00:40:45
|
|
That I would have to get back to you on.
|
00:40:53
|
|
Maybe we could work the government and trade. What do you think?
|
00:40:55
|
|
Jessica.
|
00:41:00
|
|
Sure, sure.
|
00:41:02
|
|
So Tom, you said this property is separate from the road. People travel on the road.
|
00:41:05
|
|
Is this property that we own being used for anything?
|
00:41:10
|
|
It's being used for.
|
00:41:14
|
|
Travel away.
|
00:41:16
|
|
So it is part of the road. Yeah, it is part of the road. OK.
|
00:41:17
|
|
Alright.
|
00:41:20
|
|
And McLean Rd. This is this is actually the sheriff's posse.
|
00:41:26
|
|
Building inside the town of Payson.
|
00:41:32
|
|
It is ohh well.
|
00:41:35
|
|
It was owned by the county.
|
00:41:38
|
|
This one's kind of old. It's kind of interesting, 3 or 406.
|
00:41:40
|
|
We actually acquired the deed in 1934.
|
00:41:44
|
|
And it was a broadcast in.
|
00:41:47
|
|
1995 It was given via IGA to the Sheriff's Office for their posse use.
|
00:41:50
|
|
Umm.
|
00:41:59
|
|
Potentially saleable.
|
00:42:01
|
|
Sure.
|
00:42:02
|
|
If you would like further research, we can endeavor to do that.
|
00:42:03
|
|
They're still using it today, It's it's under active use by the possible. I don't.
|
00:42:08
|
|
Mr. Terry, my opinion was we.
|
00:42:14
|
|
Keep it and keep it used for what it is. But that's my opinion. Yeah, I'm just wondering. It seems like it's.
|
00:42:16
|
|
Part of that other property and I'm just wondering if the person of that other property.
|
00:42:22
|
|
Is part of the posse.
|
00:42:27
|
|
Thought I couldn't tell if not. It's kind of a pain in the neck having it's part of the property, but if it's working.
|
00:42:29
|
|
You know.
|
00:42:36
|
|
Let sleeping dogs lie, I guess. I don't know. I guess they've been doing that, keeping everything on the building all these years.
|
00:42:37
|
|
Just would that be right?
|
00:42:40
|
|
Don't know.
|
00:42:44
|
|
We have, yeah. They.
|
00:42:46
|
|
So I have some more information. He's here. I've met with Melvin Palmer.
|
00:42:49
|
|
Who is?
|
00:42:54
|
|
Head of the party.
|
00:42:55
|
|
At and went on a tour. That's the oldest county building we have in the north.
|
00:42:57
|
|
And it's kind of historic in a sense. So I've tasked Michael this morning.
|
00:43:02
|
|
To look more into this building.
|
00:43:07
|
|
And so there will be further.
|
00:43:09
|
|
Discussion about this particular building and its use.
|
00:43:11
|
|
Going forward?
|
00:43:15
|
|
So I would say at this point it sounds like we're not interested in selling this, but we are going to try and determine more
|
00:43:16
|
|
definitively how it's used.
|
00:43:20
|
|
OK.
|
00:43:26
|
|
Is that fair enough? It is for me, OK?
|
00:43:27
|
|
Alright.
|
00:43:30
|
|
And then we had.
|
00:43:33
|
|
A whole.
|
00:43:35
|
|
Well, this was the summary of the the right away perfections.
|
00:43:37
|
|
Umm.
|
00:43:40
|
|
In District 1.
|
00:43:43
|
|
Rather than drop into each individual one.
|
00:43:46
|
|
Current full cash value per the assessor $550,000.
|
00:43:50
|
|
Ohh.
|
00:43:59
|
|
These were the two the McLean and the highway 6020 Acre.
|
00:44:02
|
|
Thing that's going to be come up on another.
|
00:44:07
|
|
Presentation.
|
00:44:09
|
|
Current assessed Value Current full cash value at 425,000.
|
00:44:10
|
|
And this one was a possible sale on the Veronica.
|
00:44:17
|
|
If I'm pronouncing that right and they said Del Caballo.
|
00:44:21
|
|
Potentially could be done. Uh, it's.
|
00:44:26
|
|
Currently.
|
00:44:29
|
|
Between the road and the private property, I don't know.
|
00:44:30
|
|
How much are they?
|
00:44:33
|
|
Shoulder we have there.
|
00:44:35
|
|
So further research.
|
00:44:38
|
|
You know, it end up getting split up into a whole bunch of little pieces.
|
00:44:41
|
|
About six or eight of them, actually.
|
00:44:45
|
|
So moving on into pine.
|
00:44:49
|
|
301-3034.
|
00:44:54
|
|
3.
|
00:44:56
|
|
256.
|
00:45:00
|
|
This is one of those ones where we need to do some further research.
|
00:45:02
|
|
Umm.
|
00:45:07
|
|
Fuller Drive.
|
00:45:08
|
|
In Pine goes through the eastern edge of those properties.
|
00:45:10
|
|
Over here on the right.
|
00:45:14
|
|
And same way with this other property that we'll get to a little bit later.
|
00:45:16
|
|
Potentially we could.
|
00:45:21
|
|
Trim off and make a portion of that sale US.
|
00:45:22
|
|
So what do you think size wise would be sellable because we're only talking 1/3 of an acre again?
|
00:45:28
|
|
Yeah, maybe looking at it visually, I would say maybe half of that.
|
00:45:35
|
|
And probably go to the adjacent property owners first dibs or however that works.
|
00:45:43
|
|
Um, that's one where we identified that. Yeah, there, there is a potential opportunity there to trim off a bit.
|
00:45:51
|
|
We need.
|
00:45:57
|
|
Whatever the you know the full amount for fuller drive.
|
00:45:58
|
|
For right away management purposes.
|
00:46:01
|
|
About 36 feet, minimum.
|
00:46:03
|
|
Between the 24 foot travel way and then shoulders and.
|
00:46:06
|
|
Um.
|
00:46:09
|
|
Drainage stitch.
|
00:46:10
|
|
Mr. Chair, if I may, yes, on on places like this where we're not sure what we need to do for the roadway.
|
00:46:12
|
|
And then there's a little piece between the roadway and other private property.
|
00:46:19
|
|
Where, Where?
|
00:46:23
|
|
Where I.
|
00:46:25
|
|
Get concerned is is is it worth the squeeze to?
|
00:46:26
|
|
Contact these property owners to see if they want that and and the reason being is because a lot of these little pieces I get
|
00:46:30
|
|
complaints on for blight.
|
00:46:34
|
|
Or or weeds.
|
00:46:39
|
|
And and it's really it's it's our property, but it's not part of our Rd. easement, but yet it's not a part of the property owners
|
00:46:40
|
|
either.
|
00:46:44
|
|
Show on on issues like this.
|
00:46:49
|
|
I I would like to offer to those property owners.
|
00:46:51
|
|
Because then they can take care of it and it's not just a.
|
00:46:55
|
|
Sore thumbs sitting between the road and their property.
|
00:46:59
|
|
That I get complaints on because nobody's taking care of the weeds.
|
00:47:02
|
|
But anyway, that's just.
|
00:47:06
|
|
My two cents work on some of these deals.
|
00:47:09
|
|
That might.
|
00:47:12
|
|
Might get it back to someone who will maintain it.
|
00:47:13
|
|
Some.
|
00:47:16
|
|
Mr. Chair, maybe this is a question for.
|
00:47:17
|
|
You, Jessica Or even Jeff, but.
|
00:47:21
|
|
You know when we have right of ways.
|
00:47:24
|
|
Out there.
|
00:47:26
|
|
That's coming from this property. That property so and so. OK, I get that.
|
00:47:27
|
|
But now in a lot of these these circumstances, we actually have just a sliver of county owned property.
|
00:47:31
|
|
That's a part of these, right? Always correct.
|
00:47:39
|
|
And so my question is when it?
|
00:47:43
|
|
Is there any liability to us as a county to have that actually?
|
00:47:46
|
|
A chunk of.
|
00:47:51
|
|
Property in or adjacent or or part of these right of ways I mean.
|
00:47:53
|
|
From our standpoint, is there, is there an issue there?
|
00:47:58
|
|
Mr. Chair and board members. It would have to be analyzed for each property.
|
00:48:04
|
|
But if you're thinking some sort of liability concerns, then the proper process for that right away specifically is to put it out
|
00:48:11
|
|
for publication.
|
00:48:16
|
|
To see who would want to submit an offer now, preference could be given to the budding owner, but you could just not offer it to
|
00:48:21
|
|
the abutting owner. It would have to be out there for the public to make an offer.
|
00:48:27
|
|
The statute would allow you to give preference to the budding owner, but only specifically for that right away, not for.
|
00:48:33
|
|
Property.
|
00:48:42
|
|
Gotcha.
|
00:48:43
|
|
Mr. Chairman and Board, if I could just offer a few comments.
|
00:48:46
|
|
If it's not this property, it's something identical in Pine Strawberry. We have an owner wanting to buy part of the property at
|
00:48:50
|
|
the top property.
|
00:48:55
|
|
When we mentioned to them 90% of the assessed value.
|
00:49:00
|
|
And and we offered it at 90% of the assessed value while we work with a county attorneys.
|
00:49:04
|
|
On whether that whole parcel was a road was a part of a roadway when it was adopted by the board to buy that property.
|
00:49:10
|
|
That property was bought to allow a roadway that had not been built by the developer to come across that subdivision. OK.
|
00:49:18
|
|
And there is a 50 foot right of way on top of this property.
|
00:49:26
|
|
And intersecting and running alongside of this property.
|
00:49:30
|
|
So we were working under the assumption that if we allowed a 50 foot right away to continue.
|
00:49:34
|
|
That no harm is done with the future use of that roadway. It's in a subdivision.
|
00:49:41
|
|
However, there is a drainage in that property.
|
00:49:46
|
|
And the property owner saying, well I don't want to buy the drainage.
|
00:49:49
|
|
And so I just wanted to share with you a couple of things.
|
00:49:52
|
|
Uh.
|
00:49:55
|
|
We.
|
00:49:57
|
|
We will determine whether or not that parcel was purchased by the board at the time.
|
00:49:58
|
|
For the purpose of a roadway, and if that's the case, it's likely we can proceed with that as a road abandonment.
|
00:50:04
|
|
If it's not, then it will be 90% of the appraised value instead of 90% of the assessed value.
|
00:50:09
|
|
Umm.
|
00:50:16
|
|
But everyone of these parcels that is alongside of a road and I had another very similar issue in Pine.
|
00:50:18
|
|
Where an owner wanted to buy a parcel that gets frontage, the B line highway, a little sliver triangle.
|
00:50:25
|
|
And he wanted to extend his parking lot.
|
00:50:32
|
|
And so if you look at it from the pictures, it says why shouldn't we be doing that?
|
00:50:35
|
|
But when you go outside, you say wait a minute, there's a bar damage that starts very little at the B line.
|
00:50:40
|
|
And it grows very quickly. And that whole, unlike sliver, is nothing but a ditch that allows drainage off of B line.
|
00:50:46
|
|
And off of that road.
|
00:50:53
|
|
And to sell it for somebody that would put a parking lot in there would be.
|
00:50:54
|
|
Uh, not in the benefit of the community.
|
00:50:58
|
|
And and so I think when we think about selling these parcels, I was reading up on what Miracle for County does for something like
|
00:51:01
|
|
this and they actually pass out this like like this parcel. We weren't if the county were interested in selling this, they routed
|
00:51:07
|
|
through the various departments facilities. Do you think we could use this in the future Roads, what's the issue with roads,
|
00:51:12
|
|
flood, what's the issue with drainage?
|
00:51:18
|
|
Community development What's the issue with setback?
|
00:51:23
|
|
And then everybody signs off. Yes, Sal, Sal, Sal, Sal.
|
00:51:26
|
|
And and we could proceed with that, but everyone of these I think.
|
00:51:30
|
|
If more than just looking at a picture.
|
00:51:33
|
|
OK. It's actually going out to the site and evaluating what's the purpose?
|
00:51:36
|
|
And and if I could say something about roads, it's.
|
00:51:40
|
|
If we own 60 feet instead of 50 feet and and that shoulder and that allows us to make a U-turn or whatever.
|
00:51:43
|
|
I I I will always, uh, when I see that form come across.
|
00:51:50
|
|
Favor keeping properties that is adjacent to a road where it does serve some Rd. purpose.
|
00:51:53
|
|
And we'll we'll staff will be on public works.
|
00:51:58
|
|
Are struggling with the question of how much right away is sufficient for the future.
|
00:52:02
|
|
OK.
|
00:52:08
|
|
If so, I just wanted to share those thoughts with you.
|
00:52:08
|
|
Thank you, Mario.
|
00:52:11
|
|
I'm Mr. Chair. Yeah, Make someone. When and what a great idea because.
|
00:52:13
|
|
Then this 103 properties once it goes through staff.
|
00:52:17
|
|
On looking at these then I think our sellable properties are gonna.
|
00:52:22
|
|
Go down considerably.
|
00:52:27
|
|
But at least we'll know the reason why we have these properties once we go through this process.
|
00:52:29
|
|
For future supervisors, it's like why don't we own all these properties well here because we've gone there and it's either a
|
00:52:35
|
|
drainage or it's part of a road and that's why we own them, which is the question that we we don't have answered. So great
|
00:52:40
|
|
suggestion on Merrill and I I think it's a good idea.
|
00:52:46
|
|
Supervisor claim.
|
00:52:53
|
|
I like it. It's good. You know what I mean? If we have a a need for some of these in house, then we should by no way sell them or
|
00:52:55
|
|
get rid of them. But I mean, these have been sitting on our plate for a long time. It's just time we addressed it and cleaned it
|
00:52:59
|
|
up.
|
00:53:03
|
|
Alright. No, look at that. The next slide is the parcel at the top.
|
00:53:10
|
|
Same discussion.
|
00:53:13
|
|
Living on a Hard Scrabble Mesa Rd. Here's another one that is perfection right away.
|
00:53:15
|
|
Umm.
|
00:53:21
|
|
So.
|
00:53:22
|
|
Kind of a non issue. You can see the road traveling through the parcel.
|
00:53:24
|
|
Cemetery Rd. In Pine.
|
00:53:30
|
|
No.
|
00:53:32
|
|
We we acquired that specifically for access to the cemetery.
|
00:53:33
|
|
Again.
|
00:53:39
|
|
Another portion of the cemetery Rd.
|
00:53:39
|
|
Huh. This one is 3/01/19.
|
00:53:44
|
|
1918 A That's a portion of South Road in Pine.
|
00:53:52
|
|
Again perfecting right away.
|
00:53:57
|
|
Another portion, 301-2644.
|
00:54:02
|
|
Again of portion of South Rd.
|
00:54:08
|
|
You can see the road traveling right through the middle of parcel.
|
00:54:09
|
|
Again, another little piece.
|
00:54:14
|
|
These these particular pieces were acquired in 1987.
|
00:54:17
|
|
3/01/27.
|
00:54:22
|
|
Wish my notes were in the same order as the slides. Sorry.
|
00:54:26
|
|
This is a portion of Old County Road, I believe the county yard.
|
00:54:30
|
|
Is just to the northeast.
|
00:54:37
|
|
Just off the frame.
|
00:54:39
|
|
Again, right away. Perfection.
|
00:54:41
|
|
Hummingbird Dr.
|
00:54:44
|
|
59-B.
|
00:54:46
|
|
That one's got a little questions, um.
|
00:54:48
|
|
We don't.
|
00:54:51
|
|
We own it, but we haven't done maintenance on it.
|
00:54:52
|
|
It was not a.
|
00:54:57
|
|
Define subdivision so it was something that was created.
|
00:54:59
|
|
More out of the Minor Land Division process.
|
00:55:03
|
|
And so probably it was a leftover piece that we ended up acquiring.
|
00:55:06
|
|
And according to my notes, we acquired that.
|
00:55:12
|
|
Back in 1990.
|
00:55:15
|
|
Uh 31341 D.
|
00:55:20
|
|
We're up again right away.
|
00:55:28
|
|
That's a portion of Bradshaw Drive at Pine Creek.
|
00:55:33
|
|
Again, we've got the right of way going through there.
|
00:55:37
|
|
34 HH Mr. Chair, I got a question. Yes Sir.
|
00:55:41
|
|
So when I, Tom, when I'm hearing you talk about leftover from a subdivision, things like that.
|
00:55:45
|
|
Do we have to accept that?
|
00:55:51
|
|
It's variable.
|
00:55:54
|
|
I thought it was yes or no.
|
00:55:57
|
|
Well, OK.
|
00:55:59
|
|
So.
|
00:56:01
|
|
When the new subdivision comes into play.
|
00:56:02
|
|
There is a dedication to the public.
|
00:56:05
|
|
And my understanding is the board.
|
00:56:08
|
|
Has to accept that dedication. So it's a two step process. It is an automatic.
|
00:56:12
|
|
Hey, baby.
|
00:56:20
|
|
Close to.
|
00:56:21
|
|
Correct.
|
00:56:23
|
|
OK.
|
00:56:26
|
|
I missed one. You better come to my cup.
|
00:56:26
|
|
Yeah.
|
00:56:30
|
|
So for the for a road to become a public Rd.
|
00:56:39
|
|
Either it's one way, it's Tom just explained the board makes a formal acceptance of the.
|
00:56:42
|
|
Road by Board action and A.
|
00:56:48
|
|
Public meeting.
|
00:56:51
|
|
The 2nd way is if.
|
00:56:53
|
|
The.
|
00:56:55
|
|
There's a Subdivision form and it's accepted.
|
00:56:57
|
|
Or it's not accepted but it's been platted?
|
00:57:00
|
|
And.
|
00:57:04
|
|
A piece of property is sold.
|
00:57:05
|
|
Out of that subdivision.
|
00:57:08
|
|
Then the subdivision becomes public roads.
|
00:57:10
|
|
And the third way is by use.
|
00:57:14
|
|
The road is used as a public Rd. over a certain period of time.
|
00:57:17
|
|
It can be a public Rd. although.
|
00:57:21
|
|
That's a.
|
00:57:24
|
|
A weak way to do it. I've seen one case out of Pinellas County where it was done that way.
|
00:57:25
|
|
With normally either formally acceptance.
|
00:57:31
|
|
Or by sale from a subdivision.
|
00:57:33
|
|
Hmm.
|
00:57:41
|
|
Well, it gives me some think about for a while, so couple of things, yeah.
|
00:57:42
|
|
Thank you.
|
00:57:46
|
|
Again, summary of the evaluation.
|
00:57:48
|
|
That we were talking about.
|
00:57:52
|
|
The unsalable, currently full cash value is about $370,000.
|
00:57:54
|
|
The.
|
00:58:00
|
|
Conditional stuff.
|
00:58:01
|
|
In Pine is about $284,000 for current full cash value.
|
00:58:04
|
|
But.
|
00:58:09
|
|
Probably not worth.
|
00:58:11
|
|
Chasing it too far.
|
00:58:13
|
|
Um, so moving on to Strawberry.
|
00:58:15
|
|
This is a drainage.
|
00:58:20
|
|
One 11133 it's the drainage lung Parkinson drive so.
|
00:58:24
|
|
Really couldn't do much with it.
|
00:58:30
|
|
Mr. Chair, I got a quick question on those drainages that we own. Are we liable for the maintenance of those?
|
00:58:33
|
|
I mean, because with those houses and stuff around it, there's a lot of weeds and trash and stuff in those drainages.
|
00:58:40
|
|
And we get complaints on it. It's like, well.
|
00:58:45
|
|
Yeah, we own it, but.
|
00:58:48
|
|
But uh.
|
00:58:51
|
|
But I guess we're not responsible for it. I you know that's a fine line and I I my question is, is.
|
00:58:52
|
|
Is, yeah, drainages are gonna have growth in them.
|
00:58:58
|
|
I'm going to.
|
00:59:01
|
|
Get garbage and stuff in them and I just want to know where our liability is and keeping them.
|
00:59:02
|
|
From being a fire hazard in neighborhoods such as this.
|
00:59:09
|
|
But after defer to my leadership on that question and so this too good but still a question Mr. Chair going forward and I I hear
|
00:59:14
|
|
what you're saying Tim and I.
|
00:59:19
|
|
If you want my opinion, I would say we're liable for them. We make everybody else liable for their property.
|
00:59:24
|
|
We should be liable for ours.
|
00:59:29
|
|
Well, I have to agree, but then we're gonna have to need three more crews, I think.
|
00:59:32
|
|
Alright.
|
00:59:40
|
|
Moving on, 3/01/04, this is a if I remember right, this is a big retention pond.
|
00:59:41
|
|
Um.
|
00:59:49
|
|
So not really salable there. Again, our retention pond is going to have growth and we we own a lake if it looks, if it looks
|
00:59:51
|
|
really bad, it's a seasonal you know.
|
00:59:56
|
|
Yes.
|
01:00:05
|
|
Yeah, with weeds 4 foot tall, yeah.
|
01:00:06
|
|
Umm.
|
01:00:10
|
|
This one again right away implications.
|
01:00:13
|
|
You've got the intersection of two roads, so you really don't want to triangle stick it into the road.
|
01:00:16
|
|
So better just to keep it.
|
01:00:21
|
|
Good.
|
01:00:23
|
|
Uh, these three are.
|
01:00:24
|
|
Umm.
|
01:00:27
|
|
310322
|
01:00:31
|
|
part of Fossil Creek Rd.
|
01:00:34
|
|
Um.
|
01:00:37
|
|
301-0320 N.
|
01:00:39
|
|
Right away for Fossil Creek.
|
01:00:42
|
|
Again, these are all fossil portions. Fossil Creek Rd.
|
01:00:45
|
|
Again, here's UH.
|
01:00:49
|
|
This may be the exact parcel Homero was.
|
01:00:51
|
|
Referring to.
|
01:00:54
|
|
The intersection of Strawberry.
|
01:00:56
|
|
I think it's Lucianne An 87.
|
01:00:59
|
|
Not really. Conducive you've got.
|
01:01:02
|
|
With the.
|
01:01:04
|
|
Coming down off the hill.
|
01:01:06
|
|
On 87, so not really conducive to.
|
01:01:07
|
|
Umm.
|
01:01:11
|
|
Altering.
|
01:01:11
|
|
And we need it for right away geometry in the future.
|
01:01:12
|
|
Ohh 301-1017.
|
01:01:17
|
|
Sorry, I'm trying to move quickly and appreciate people's time.
|
01:01:22
|
|
You're doing great portion of Parkinson drive.
|
01:01:26
|
|
Right away.
|
01:01:30
|
|
Uh-huh.
|
01:01:30
|
|
Again, another.
|
01:01:32
|
|
Piece uh, we got the Parcel Creek Rd. and I can't quite read what's to the north, the road going to.
|
01:01:34
|
|
But we still have right away concerns.
|
01:01:39
|
|
301054 L.
|
01:01:43
|
|
Ohh Diane Circle.
|
01:01:49
|
|
In strawberry.
|
01:01:51
|
|
In 22, there was a treasurer's deed and the county took it over.
|
01:01:53
|
|
UH, for transportation purposes.
|
01:01:57
|
|
Again one of the common little slivers, Fossil Creek Rd. and Walnut Dr. and Strawberry.
|
01:02:01
|
|
Ohh 30108140.
|
01:02:09
|
|
Ohh this is um.
|
01:02:14
|
|
Being used actively used by the county when we did the rework on Fossil Creek. There's a large MU mailbox collection there, and
|
01:02:17
|
|
when we're doing maintenance, the roads department uses it for staging equipment.
|
01:02:24
|
|
So that's fair. I know where that is.
|
01:02:33
|
|
Yeah.
|
01:02:36
|
|
Yeah.
|
01:02:37
|
|
So for Strawberry on the summary, um.
|
01:02:40
|
|
You know the.
|
01:02:44
|
|
Probable not salable.
|
01:02:46
|
|
Approximate full cash value $100,000.
|
01:02:48
|
|
And then you can see the other.
|
01:02:51
|
|
Um.
|
01:02:53
|
|
Right away 32,000 vacant land 60 but that's that MU.
|
01:02:55
|
|
Cluster.
|
01:03:00
|
|
So moving on to District 2.
|
01:03:03
|
|
Any further?
|
01:03:06
|
|
So I wanna present a a thought so.
|
01:03:08
|
|
You're doing a great job, Tom, and I appreciate how thorough all this is.
|
01:03:12
|
|
Do the other supervisors want to continue with this presentation or should we direct staff to try and narrow this?
|
01:03:17
|
|
I need a I need to know if we want to keep going.
|
01:03:25
|
|
The way we are, or whether we want to instruct them to narrow and represent.
|
01:03:29
|
|
Properties that may.
|
01:03:35
|
|
Health options.
|
01:03:38
|
|
Other than those that are really no option.
|
01:03:40
|
|
May 1st go ahead.
|
01:03:44
|
|
Yeah, let's keep going because there's some of these that's going to bring up some questions. It's not that we have to dwell on
|
01:03:46
|
|
each of these for a long time now.
|
01:03:49
|
|
I think we can go through them fairly quickly, but there's going to be some some of these properties that's going to bring up some
|
01:03:53
|
|
questions, I'm almost sure.
|
01:03:56
|
|
OK, let's keep going. I mean, surprise or Humphrey?
|
01:04:00
|
|
Well, I'm trying to with you because we're here and and I know that staff is going to look through these and it's going to narrow
|
01:04:04
|
|
our list a lot. But like the questions of liability of some of these drainages and things like that, that's an important question
|
01:04:09
|
|
and to be asked.
|
01:04:14
|
|
And so, Mr. Chair, you have someone from the audience and so.
|
01:04:19
|
|
But anyway, I I'd like to go forward just because as as we have things some of it might not be interesting but but it's going to
|
01:04:24
|
|
create questions that we've already come up with.
|
01:04:29
|
|
That's going to help staff when they go look at some of these properties, some of these questions on maintenance and maintaining
|
01:04:35
|
|
and.
|
01:04:38
|
|
Things of this nature.
|
01:04:42
|
|
But anyway.
|
01:04:43
|
|
OK, we'll proceed. And so Jessica let me know. We do have a request from the audience who Mr. Vince Hudson who has.
|
01:04:45
|
|
A question or two?
|
01:04:53
|
|
On this topic, is this the appropriate time to ask him to ask those?
|
01:04:55
|
|
Chairman, Member, Supervisors, If it's in regard to this topic, it would be at your discretion, yes. You wouldn't be allowed to do
|
01:05:02
|
|
so. OK, so Mr. Hudson, do you wanna ask a question or two to this? Please come up to the mic and introduce yourself if you would,
|
01:05:07
|
|
please.
|
01:05:11
|
|
OK. Thank you folks for letting me speak. My name is Vince Hudson. I sell commercial real estate. I've done it for.
|
01:05:17
|
|
Since the 70s.
|
01:05:23
|
|
This problem that you guys have here.
|
01:05:25
|
|
Is major, but it can be addressed and solved pretty simply.
|
01:05:28
|
|
First thing we need to do is have title reports pulled on all these properties and.
|
01:05:33
|
|
I guarantee you probably don't have entire report on one.
|
01:05:38
|
|
It's common because I deal on this stuff all the time.
|
01:05:41
|
|
I'm not the guy for you to do this.
|
01:05:44
|
|
But you may want to talk contact someone like Rory or someone out of patient.
|
01:05:47
|
|
That works for ERA.
|
01:05:52
|
|
Have him go through these parcels.
|
01:05:54
|
|
Put a value on them, but a preliminary title report will tell you.
|
01:05:56
|
|
What you need to know and what you can do, but as someone was in here talking about.
|
01:06:01
|
|
Right aways.
|
01:06:07
|
|
If you own the property and I cross it.
|
01:06:08
|
|
And I hit this man right here and I kill him.
|
01:06:12
|
|
Yours liable as I am because you own the property, so that's something that the county needs to.
|
01:06:15
|
|
What's not good and savvy properties for your guys?
|
01:06:22
|
|
Developments and for your.
|
01:06:25
|
|
Engineering, road work and stuff.
|
01:06:27
|
|
Best thing to do is get rid of it.
|
01:06:30
|
|
But.
|
01:06:33
|
|
Please pull a title report on these because.
|
01:06:33
|
|
If not, you're going to have problems.
|
01:06:37
|
|
And that's I came down here because.
|
01:06:39
|
|
It's what I do, and I'm in a Rep with you guys right now. I'll again here know who I am over the property that's behind me in
|
01:06:41
|
|
flooding.
|
01:06:45
|
|
And This is why No title report was ever pulled.
|
01:06:49
|
|
When you pull the title report on that property behind us that the Randles quick claim to you guys.
|
01:06:53
|
|
They're gonna find out the Rams hitting on the right to do it.
|
01:06:58
|
|
So.
|
01:07:01
|
|
I mean, I'm just, I'm trying to help everybody.
|
01:07:02
|
|
And if.
|
01:07:04
|
|
If you need me for school and help you try to find someone. I'm more than willing to do that.
|
01:07:06
|
|
But if you take these apms.
|
01:07:12
|
|
To pioneer title Any of the other title companies.
|
01:07:15
|
|
As many as you got to probably going to charge you.
|
01:07:19
|
|
But.
|
01:07:23
|
|
That's where you need to start because.
|
01:07:24
|
|
At the end of the day.
|
01:07:26
|
|
You gotta have clean, marketable title to sell it to somebody.
|
01:07:28
|
|
But your neighbors?
|
01:07:31
|
|
Every day is always your Best Buy.
|
01:07:32
|
|
OK. Thank you, Mr. Hudson. Thank you.
|
01:07:35
|
|
Ohh.
|
01:07:37
|
|
Go ahead, Tom.
|
01:07:38
|
|
All right.
|
01:07:40
|
|
Moving on to District 2.
|
01:07:41
|
|
Small piece of property in Healing County.
|
01:07:46
|
|
Uh, in Claypool.
|
01:07:50
|
|
2/06/06.
|
01:07:54
|
|
I think I know what the answer is on this one, but I want to make sure.
|
01:07:58
|
|
6195 DMD did, yeah.
|
01:08:04
|
|
These are on Long St. and those are involved with Troy City, aren't they?
|
01:08:08
|
|
So right now, it's right away.
|
01:08:17
|
|
Umm.
|
01:08:19
|
|
2/06/09.
|
01:08:21
|
|
Umm.
|
01:08:24
|
|
This one.
|
01:08:29
|
|
90.
|
01:08:30
|
|
Uh.
|
01:08:31
|
|
It's.
|
01:08:33
|
|
It's a demand and it would certainly be worth salable.
|
01:08:34
|
|
The.
|
01:08:39
|
|
Adjacent properties are actually owned by the state of Arizona.
|
01:08:40
|
|
So I believe that's.
|
01:08:44
|
|
A different.
|
01:08:47
|
|
Maybe a tax thing, I don't know.
|
01:08:50
|
|
Incurred the county, right, Tom?
|
01:08:53
|
|
I believe so.
|
01:08:55
|
|
But then when I went and had a quick peek at.
|
01:08:58
|
|
Said.
|
01:09:02
|
|
State of Arizona like the the ones to the North and South.
|
01:09:02
|
|
Um.
|
01:09:09
|
|
These are more.
|
01:09:11
|
|
Vacant land.
|
01:09:12
|
|
1076.
|
01:09:14
|
|
That one was actually sold.
|
01:09:17
|
|
Um.
|
01:09:19
|
|
Earlier this year.
|
01:09:20
|
|
79.
|
01:09:23
|
|
Again, this area has multiple State of Arizona parcels.
|
01:09:26
|
|
Adjacent and all these are vacant lots, so.
|
01:09:29
|
|
We probably acquired them through.
|
01:09:33
|
|
Treasurers, deeds, or.
|
01:09:36
|
|
Some fashion.
|
01:09:39
|
|
Mr. Chair for many.
|
01:09:40
|
|
So these pink.
|
01:09:42
|
|
Colored.
|
01:09:45
|
|
Blocks right there. Those are all state land.
|
01:09:46
|
|
Arizona.
|
01:09:49
|
|
Those are, yes, I believe they are.
|
01:09:50
|
|
And all these we acquired in.
|
01:09:56
|
|
Various years the 79 and 82 was back in.
|
01:10:01
|
|
1977.
|
01:10:05
|
|
So a lot of these have been sitting around for quite some time.
|
01:10:07
|
|
Mr. Chair, if I may, Yeah, It'll be interesting once staff looks at some of these because it looks like there's it's in a
|
01:10:12
|
|
residential area, there's.
|
01:10:16
|
|
Properties attached to them.
|
01:10:20
|
|
So it would seem that they might have value to their neighbors.
|
01:10:22
|
|
Yeah, Kaito Loma comes down.
|
01:10:27
|
|
To the South here.
|
01:10:30
|
|
Its way around. Like you said, it's hard to tell by a picture, but it'll be.
|
01:10:32
|
|
Interesting. On some of these properties, after staff takes a look at them, it's.
|
01:10:36
|
|
So.
|
01:10:43
|
|
Through that area.
|
01:10:45
|
|
Approximate $45,000 full cash value currently.
|
01:10:46
|
|
Um, again?
|
01:10:51
|
|
That looks where the partial numbers.
|
01:10:54
|
|
Pretty much duplicated.
|
01:10:58
|
|
Play.
|
01:10:59
|
|
Moving into Globe, this is one of the drainage ditches along Down 6 Shooter Canyon.
|
01:11:00
|
|
Not really much that can be done with that.
|
01:11:08
|
|
So.
|
01:11:12
|
|
Mr. Chairman may on on something like that, that's in the middle of globe.
|
01:11:13
|
|
Use it for a good example.
|
01:11:17
|
|
Is there?
|
01:11:19
|
|
Well, but is there an interest for Globe having it, I mean.
|
01:11:23
|
|
Mr. Supervisor, we're outside the globe city limits on this one. Ohh OK, never mind.
|
01:11:27
|
|
OK, that that took care of that one that that's all us.
|
01:11:33
|
|
Cold sway again, It's a right away.
|
01:11:38
|
|
That was.
|
01:11:43
|
|
13.
|
01:11:46
|
|
It was an easement.
|
01:11:51
|
|
Out of our record survey that created all that private property so people are traversing it actively.
|
01:11:53
|
|
Prickly PEAR 2/05/18. This one actually might circle back to your question supervisor Klein.
|
01:12:01
|
|
That's inside the city world.
|
01:12:09
|
|
Um, quickly pair weight. So would it be worthwhile to?
|
01:12:13
|
|
Look to transfer it to the City of Globe.
|
01:12:18
|
|
Master Chief and I I I would say yes, because as we look further into our liabilities and stuff with some of these properties, it
|
01:12:21
|
|
would be best if if it is in the city of globe that the Mayor and Council be responsible for it, not the Board of Supervisors.
|
01:12:29
|
|
Right. So Mr. Chair from May also and Jeff here because we've been going back and forth with Jeff over a little piece of property
|
01:12:37
|
|
in Winkleman.
|
01:12:41
|
|
That we have that actually the town of Winkelman is actually using for like storage.
|
01:12:46
|
|
Um.
|
01:12:53
|
|
But the way I understand and Jeff, correct me again if I'm wrong because it's been a while, but we're back to that 90%.
|
01:12:56
|
|
For sale type deal on that.
|
01:13:02
|
|
Market value.
|
01:13:07
|
|
I don't know to have another government entity.
|
01:13:08
|
|
So.
|
01:13:12
|
|
So where we going?
|
01:13:14
|
|
Sell to another government entity.
|
01:13:17
|
|
You are.
|
01:13:20
|
|
Relieved of these public auction requirements?
|
01:13:21
|
|
But you still have to comply with the.
|
01:13:25
|
|
90% of Fair market value requirement.
|
01:13:27
|
|
Yeah.
|
01:13:32
|
|
This, this and I.
|
01:13:33
|
|
This supervisor is something I dropped the ball on this year for our legislative conference.
|
01:13:35
|
|
This is something that we could absolutely take to the legislative conference to look at to get that changed because in my mind,
|
01:13:40
|
|
it does not make any sense to me.
|
01:13:45
|
|
Why we would have to sell that to the City of Globe?
|
01:13:50
|
|
Or.
|
01:13:53
|
|
A lot to a city of Winkelman.
|
01:13:54
|
|
For another governmental use, to me it just seems like it obvious simple transfer.
|
01:13:57
|
|
But under the current status, right Jeff, right now this is what sent status.
|
01:14:02
|
|
And I know exactly what you're talking about for that Winkleman.
|
01:14:10
|
|
It's their maintenance yard, yet we own the property in the middle of it.
|
01:14:13
|
|
So.
|
01:14:18
|
|
Thank you, Jeff. Yeah, I agree cause like I say going forward with this questions are coming up that that need to be pursued
|
01:14:19
|
|
further because if it's a state property, we can buy it for a dollar if we're using it for drainage or for a road. Is that not
|
01:14:23
|
|
correct?
|
01:14:28
|
|
If the state is selling it to you, no. If it if it's state property.
|
01:14:35
|
|
Then we can obtain it for a dollar.
|
01:14:40
|
|
If we're using it for.
|
01:14:43
|
|
Drainage or roads?
|
01:14:46
|
|
Like if it's a tax lien sale properly ohh you're somebody bought the state you tax property date.
|
01:14:49
|
|
Then we can take it from the state for a dollar.
|
01:14:54
|
|
If we're using it for roads or for drainage.
|
01:14:57
|
|
So that's government entity to government entity, and I don't know why that wouldn't be the same.
|
01:15:01
|
|
With county to county if it's state to county.
|
01:15:06
|
|
Yeah, there's a lot of legal fictions going on there.
|
01:15:11
|
|
Because when that property is sold.
|
01:15:14
|
|
For taxes.
|
01:15:16
|
|
It's sold to the state.
|
01:15:17
|
|
But that's the name only. There's no department down in Phoenix.
|
01:15:20
|
|
That houses all these properties and there's a lot of people down there talking about them. It doesn't exist. It's amazing.
|
01:15:24
|
|
His soul to the state.
|
01:15:29
|
|
And the counties? The one that takes care of it.
|
01:15:31
|
|
And sells it and so forth.
|
01:15:34
|
|
No.
|
01:15:37
|
|
That actually hung us up in in Hayden with that parking lot down there.
|
01:15:37
|
|
You know, because it was, it was, it was, you know, they quit paying taxes on it. It goes back to the state and care of HeLa
|
01:15:42
|
|
County and you're exactly right. There's nobody down there that deals with the plan, right.
|
01:15:47
|
|
But then it goes back to Tim, like you were saying for drainage or transportation.
|
01:15:53
|
|
That's why it's turned into a parking lot, so the semis could park there.
|
01:15:58
|
|
And and Old Town, because I don't have any place to park so.
|
01:16:02
|
|
That was a that was a hurdle. We had to.
|
01:16:04
|
|
Get over, too.
|
01:16:06
|
|
That that's the only way it works.
|
01:16:09
|
|
Yeah. All right. This is part of Sanders drive.
|
01:16:12
|
|
Again, right away use.
|
01:16:17
|
|
1.
|
01:16:19
|
|
That's that's Blvd. This is.
|
01:16:20
|
|
Where they're building the roundabout in front of the hospital.
|
01:16:25
|
|
So are we in the process of?
|
01:16:28
|
|
Doing something with that.
|
01:16:31
|
|
Other caregivers.
|
01:16:36
|
|
3rd.
|
01:16:39
|
|
Ohh again right away issue.
|
01:16:43
|
|
And if if we could back up one.
|
01:16:45
|
|
And and.
|
01:16:48
|
|
How many people use that right away?
|
01:16:50
|
|
1234 I'm counting 5, OK?
|
01:16:53
|
|
Alright, just based on the simple line work in the area.
|
01:16:58
|
|
OK.
|
01:17:01
|
|
Thank you. Yeah, it looks like there's some driveways. There could be more.
|
01:17:03
|
|
Public Library and the.
|
01:17:07
|
|
This is again right away. Inspiration terrace up.
|
01:17:10
|
|
If you go up Inspiration drive past the water tanks that you can see on the north side the road.
|
01:17:14
|
|
Goes over the side and there's more.
|
01:17:19
|
|
Property access up there.
|
01:17:20
|
|
Arizona 85539.
|
01:17:23
|
|
Uh, this is the.
|
01:17:26
|
|
Ohh, this is where the posse building used to be in front of APS.
|
01:17:30
|
|
On one 8188 is against the left edge there.
|
01:17:34
|
|
Umm.
|
01:17:38
|
|
The intersection of 60 is down off the bottom and while it's on the trails, up top.
|
01:17:38
|
|
APS is the building you can see on the right edge of the picture.
|
01:17:43
|
|
So that one would be.
|
01:17:47
|
|
Certainly worthwhile. He's moved to Posse building off that.
|
01:17:48
|
|
Facility.
|
01:17:52
|
|
So.
|
01:17:55
|
|
Mr. Chair, for me. So it makes sense that APS picked that up when it.
|
01:17:56
|
|
One option.
|
01:18:01
|
|
But.
|
01:18:05
|
|
We're no longer actively using it for the posse.
|
01:18:06
|
|
Do you know Michael?
|
01:18:10
|
|
I don't believe so.
|
01:18:11
|
|
Because.
|
01:18:12
|
|
Yeah.
|
01:18:14
|
|
So that would be certainly worthwhile one that could be explored for.
|
01:18:15
|
|
Disposal.
|
01:18:20
|
|
Glendale Ave.
|
01:18:25
|
|
2/07/09.
|
01:18:27
|
|
This I believe is.
|
01:18:30
|
|
Drainage, yeah.
|
01:18:32
|
|
So those those properties on the top.
|
01:18:35
|
|
They're up on a hill and that's a drainage flow.
|
01:18:38
|
|
So hang on a minute, Mr. Chair. Yeah, So right there, Tom and me. This question for you Jeff, if that is nothing but drainage
|
01:18:43
|
|
right there.
|
01:18:48
|
|
I mean, there again, is this in the city limits? No, it's in the county, never mind. But if it was in the city limits, couldn't we
|
01:18:53
|
|
make a deal with Globe to take it? I mean, they may want it for.
|
01:18:58
|
|
Maintenance or whatever.
|
01:19:03
|
|
Not unless they want to pay 90%.
|
01:19:05
|
|
Well, I think if it's for drainage or transportation, we can do different things with it.
|
01:19:07
|
|
Alright, thank you. The statue don't need it? No.
|
01:19:13
|
|
Some of the stuff I've worked with on and off the top of my head.
|
01:19:17
|
|
Other things I'm gonna read first, they'd have to incorporate to take it in. Yeah, but if we're we may come across one here in a
|
01:19:20
|
|
minute. That other one could have been It's a Rd.
|
01:19:25
|
|
Yeah, for Rd.
|
01:19:30
|
|
207231 Q.
|
01:19:34
|
|
All this is all part of Hope Lane.
|
01:19:37
|
|
You can see it coming through. This is going on to the Russell Gulch landfill.
|
01:19:42
|
|
This is just various county property. You know how Russell Gold's landfill is up.
|
01:19:47
|
|
Is in a bowl.
|
01:19:53
|
|
These are all the sides of the hills.
|
01:19:54
|
|
As you head into the landfill.
|
01:19:56
|
|
So I would imagine those will remain counties from now on.
|
01:20:00
|
|
If we did want to sell it.
|
01:20:03
|
|
But there there's some.
|
01:20:05
|
|
Maneuverability in some of them, but yeah.
|
01:20:07
|
|
Umm.
|
01:20:10
|
|
But for the most part, yeah, it'll be used for long term.
|
01:20:11
|
|
Or acquired for long term purposes.
|
01:20:15
|
|
And you can also see the drainage coming down.
|
01:20:20
|
|
Through the through the southern portion of that property right there.
|
01:20:23
|
|
Those properties up in the top left, those little cluster of five, they're actually accessed off a different Rd. so potentially
|
01:20:28
|
|
they could be looked at as disposal.
|
01:20:32
|
|
Yeah, Mr. Chair, if I might.
|
01:20:39
|
|
Umm.
|
01:20:41
|
|
If we could look into the transfer of property from government entity to government entity for roads, parks or drainages.
|
01:20:42
|
|
Umm.
|
01:20:51
|
|
That would that would be interesting to know the legal.
|
01:20:53
|
|
Part of that because some of these that.
|
01:20:57
|
|
That we have in other places if they're if they were going to use it for a park or a road or a drainage.
|
01:20:59
|
|
Then perhaps they wouldn't have to pay the 90% of the appraised value.
|
01:21:05
|
|
OK.
|
01:21:11
|
|
Maybe.
|
01:21:13
|
|
So again more.
|
01:21:16
|
|
Umm.
|
01:21:19
|
|
Landfill This goes down into the.
|
01:21:20
|
|
The Little Acres Spectral Tracked area S on Russell Rd.
|
01:21:24
|
|
These two properties.
|
01:21:29
|
|
You can see.
|
01:21:31
|
|
Russell Gulch right there off the east edge of the.
|
01:21:34
|
|
Left edge of the.
|
01:21:38
|
|
Rd.
|
01:21:39
|
|
These were purchased for flood purposes.
|
01:21:41
|
|
Way back when, 2/7/29.
|
01:21:45
|
|
These were purchased back in 1977 by the county.
|
01:21:51
|
|
I I don't. I mean, I've been there and I don't understand what they do for flood.
|
01:21:55
|
|
If if the Creek.
|
01:22:00
|
|
Raises way up.
|
01:22:02
|
|
You know, maybe Russell Rd. got repaved.
|
01:22:04
|
|
Since 1977 then?
|
01:22:08
|
|
Don't know.
|
01:22:10
|
|
But OK, yeah, because I mean the.
|
01:22:12
|
|
Yeah, OK. This was purchased. This was a sort of interesting.
|
01:22:14
|
|
There was a cluster of them purchased in 77.
|
01:22:20
|
|
Back then.
|
01:22:24
|
|
OK, well maybe now that it's been so long the needs not there anymore.
|
01:22:26
|
|
Perhaps be something look into I guess.
|
01:22:32
|
|
Look, looking at the top level deed, I didn't go any deeper than the last deed. It didn't show any of the FEMA restrictions that
|
01:22:35
|
|
we've talked about. We'll we'll see those when we get into Roosevelt.
|
01:22:41
|
|
So I looked at, yeah, like I said, going forward after staff looks at these, maybe those will be something that would be
|
01:22:47
|
|
beneficial to the neighbor right there next next to them. Absolutely, when you look at that.
|
01:22:53
|
|
Right there. I mean you got other places right right there below that's coming right to the highway.
|
01:23:00
|
|
Yeah, I mean, I there's there's no rhyme or reason why we would have bought those two to me, neither was in 77 for for Flood.
|
01:23:05
|
|
Yeah, but.
|
01:23:13
|
|
I mean it it would be different to me if there's a whole line or long Russell Rd. like that, you know?
|
01:23:15
|
|
Well, yeah, I could say we're, we're trying to make sense of it. Well, it's time we get in. So that's good. Yeah. Yeah. Thank.
|
01:23:21
|
|
Currently it's a parking lot of convenience.
|
01:23:25
|
|
OK.
|
01:23:32
|
|
This is over just east of the Central Heights School.
|
01:23:33
|
|
Uh where?
|
01:23:38
|
|
Health and Emergency Management.
|
01:23:39
|
|
Are at um.
|
01:23:42
|
|
This one.
|
01:23:44
|
|
2073010 A.
|
01:23:46
|
|
Where is it?
|
01:23:48
|
|
Uh.
|
01:23:50
|
|
It's actually owned.
|
01:23:52
|
|
The note I have in here that it's actually owned by the Miami school district and the county is.
|
01:23:55
|
|
Under a 20 year lease that expired.
|
01:24:00
|
|
Some time ago, somewhere in current automatic five year extensions.
|
01:24:07
|
|
So.
|
01:24:13
|
|
Explain that whole So the Miami school district actually owns.
|
01:24:14
|
|
The Central Heights property.
|
01:24:19
|
|
We are in a leasing.
|
01:24:21
|
|
Scenario for the property.
|
01:24:24
|
|
And this?
|
01:24:26
|
|
This is one part of that.
|
01:24:27
|
|
So everything, all of our buildings in there is leased.
|
01:24:30
|
|
That's that's.
|
01:24:34
|
|
Yeah.
|
01:24:35
|
|
It's the school district. I think we lease it for $1.00 a year.
|
01:24:36
|
|
Well, that makes me feel better about all the money we put into that. That's always going through my head right now.
|
01:24:43
|
|
Part of the lease is full maintenance. You pay your own checkbook.
|
01:24:50
|
|
OK. And so is that part of the parking lot over there or no, it it's actually that all that's behind and it's done, it's unusable
|
01:24:55
|
|
property, yeah.
|
01:25:00
|
|
OK.
|
01:25:05
|
|
A lot of that's just hillside. If I remember right, it is. Yeah, but.
|
01:25:06
|
|
OK, so that brings up another question.
|
01:25:10
|
|
Michael is.
|
01:25:13
|
|
Can can we just go through whatever process and own it, I mean.
|
01:25:16
|
|
We certainly could take a look at that. Absolutely. It doesn't make any sense to me to have a lease and then another.
|
01:25:21
|
|
Government agency involved with something we're not going to give up or change ever.
|
01:25:26
|
|
That I could foresee right now. So why we don't own it? I kind of beyond me. I thought we did own it actually.
|
01:25:31
|
|
Yeah, I I certainly will take a look at that.
|
01:25:37
|
|
Chairman, member and another.
|
01:25:40
|
|
Question is that property and I know we don't have enough parking over there.
|
01:25:42
|
|
If that's a hill.
|
01:25:46
|
|
It could that possibly add to.
|
01:25:48
|
|
Parking.
|
01:25:50
|
|
Area 4.
|
01:25:51
|
|
That facility possibly, however, if you.
|
01:25:54
|
|
If you go out there and you take a look at the very steep hill and it's narrow.
|
01:25:57
|
|
Ohh, currently right, Right at the top of that we have just two Conex boxes for a couple of the departments in central heights to
|
01:26:01
|
|
sort store some of the things in there. But it is a very narrow piece of property when you get up there, OK.
|
01:26:07
|
|
Michaelson Building.
|
01:26:20
|
|
Any questions? Yeah.
|
01:26:22
|
|
We're doing a good job with it, Yep.
|
01:26:26
|
|
This next one is is.
|
01:26:30
|
|
Was really interesting.
|
01:26:32
|
|
To me, the county acquired it.
|
01:26:34
|
|
We're we're talking about this?
|
01:26:38
|
|
Partial up here, that's on 60 and I believe it's.
|
01:26:41
|
|
Maybe 4th or 5th St.
|
01:26:47
|
|
The county owns it.
|
01:26:50
|
|
But there's a.
|
01:26:52
|
|
Permanent it. It's also inside the city limits, but there is a permanent a dot easement on it.
|
01:26:54
|
|
For what? I don't know.
|
01:27:01
|
|
Hmm.
|
01:27:04
|
|
We'll know more after staff looks, yeah.
|
01:27:07
|
|
But but that goes back to your question earlier if ADOT has a permanent easement there.
|
01:27:10
|
|
There's no reason for us to own it. State should own it.
|
01:27:16
|
|
Highways and drainages.
|
01:27:21
|
|
More research.
|
01:27:23
|
|
Yeah.
|
01:27:24
|
|
Yes.
|
01:27:26
|
|
I've I've.
|
01:27:26
|
|
Annotated that.
|
01:27:27
|
|
Appreciate it.
|
01:27:29
|
|
Uh.
|
01:27:30
|
|
So again coming here to the summary sheet of.
|
01:27:31
|
|
You know full cash value about $728,000.
|
01:27:35
|
|
And then a little more focus.
|
01:27:40
|
|
As a possibility, well, the a lot of these are in.
|
01:27:42
|
|
Ohh.
|
01:27:47
|
|
Related to the landfill, that's 317 full cash.
|
01:27:48
|
|
Christmas.
|
01:27:54
|
|
Hope Lane again.
|
01:27:56
|
|
More property.
|
01:27:58
|
|
Moving into Miami.
|
01:28:00
|
|
Tomorrow 6:00.
|
01:28:04
|
|
2603.
|
01:28:09
|
|
One more page.
|
01:28:12
|
|
This is a.
|
01:28:16
|
|
Drainage. Um, it is on.
|
01:28:19
|
|
Elam, but it is not. This is in the.
|
01:28:22
|
|
County portion that's.
|
01:28:26
|
|
It's drainage off the hill.
|
01:28:29
|
|
Miner.
|
01:28:31
|
|
More drainage.
|
01:28:34
|
|
On this one 19154.
|
01:28:38
|
|
2619.
|
01:28:44
|
|
There it is.
|
01:28:50
|
|
This one actually is inside the city limits of Miami or town limits Miami. So.
|
01:28:52
|
|
Would have potential for.
|
01:28:57
|
|
Ohh.
|
01:28:59
|
|
For training for the town of Miami, yeah.
|
01:29:01
|
|
And their liability?
|
01:29:05
|
|
More research.
|
01:29:08
|
|
1954.
|
01:29:10
|
|
Look at that.
|
01:29:12
|
|
So.
|
01:29:15
|
|
Not a whole lot.
|
01:29:16
|
|
Where's that place? No. Yeah, we on that. You'll be doing something with that.
|
01:29:19
|
|
Tell you what, I'll take you to lunch at the Marina and point it out as we go by.
|
01:29:27
|
|
Uh.
|
01:29:32
|
|
Roosevelt You know, there's been a lot of activity there.
|
01:29:33
|
|
2/04/03 Probably some of these you guys may have more.
|
01:29:37
|
|
Intimate knowledge than I do. This is part of Campaign Creek as it goes through.
|
01:29:43
|
|
The.
|
01:29:49
|
|
The states.
|
01:29:50
|
|
You know, so the previous buyout, yeah, this is, this is one of the FEMA 2004 property there for flood, yeah.
|
01:29:51
|
|
This was one of the specific 2004 FEMA buyouts. You can put up anything you want as long as it doesn't have walls.
|
01:30:00
|
|
Yes.
|
01:30:08
|
|
Umm.
|
01:30:10
|
|
So.
|
01:30:11
|
|
Yeah.
|
01:30:13
|
|
So Tim, is there any neighbors around there that?
|
01:30:13
|
|
I I don't think so. And the only neighbors around that area we're we're working on a grant to buy their homes.
|
01:30:18
|
|
Because they get water in them when Campaign Creek runs. So. So yeah, that's.
|
01:30:24
|
|
That area has that that Creek has taken out those homes. That's why the we went through a grant to buy those years ago.
|
01:30:32
|
|
And so now we're in the middle of a grant to buy some of those others.
|
01:30:41
|
|
That you're seeing up to the left a little bit.
|
01:30:46
|
|
Because.
|
01:30:50
|
|
That.
|
01:30:51
|
|
That's a dangerous Creek. And now that they've burned all that up above, it's a real dangerous Creek. We've dredged that many
|
01:30:52
|
|
times trying to control it.
|
01:30:56
|
|
And and and it just keeps filling up with sediment and it it's, it's, I don't see it ever getting much better.
|
01:31:00
|
|
OK. This one is the part that North End of Stagecoach, it's a drainage.
|
01:31:11
|
|
That the county recently purchased.
|
01:31:18
|
|
Two or four or six and we did that for the drainage down Stagecoach and it needs a.
|
01:31:20
|
|
Needs to be able to tie back into Pennell Creek.
|
01:31:28
|
|
And so that was purchased from the Tucker so that we can.
|
01:31:31
|
|
Go down Stagecoach where the where you can see the roadway.
|
01:31:35
|
|
And then it'll go left through that property back to Pennell Creek to drain.
|
01:31:39
|
|
That stage, coach area.
|
01:31:44
|
|
And again another portion of that.
|
01:31:47
|
|
That was purchased for drainage.
|
01:31:49
|
|
Yes.
|
01:31:51
|
|
Uh, this property is another one of the, I believe, another one of the FEMA buyouts.
|
01:31:54
|
|
437.
|
01:31:59
|
|
No.
|
01:32:02
|
|
But it was purchased in 1969.
|
01:32:03
|
|
Nominally for flood purposes, probably.
|
01:32:08
|
|
As their dwellings on that no the.
|
01:32:13
|
|
So we haven't gone in and done the survey work to.
|
01:32:16
|
|
Have a real tight.
|
01:32:21
|
|
Line control.
|
01:32:23
|
|
On.
|
01:32:25
|
|
Over here you can see the fences for the adjacent property. So this would be over here. Right now the this line working in the
|
01:32:27
|
|
online map is eyeball aligned.
|
01:32:33
|
|
Trolleys, so.
|
01:32:39
|
|
Again, some of these will be interesting once we get boots on the ground to look at them and get assessments from.
|
01:32:41
|
|
Staff departments.
|
01:32:48
|
|
Channel 12404 Thirty 7.
|
01:32:52
|
|
Roosevelt summary.
|
01:32:59
|
|
194,000 approximately.
|
01:33:00
|
|
Um, and.
|
01:33:04
|
|
You know potentially 20,000 cash value on.
|
01:33:08
|
|
Ohh, that's that.
|
01:33:11
|
|
We identified it as salable because we couldn't figure out why, but that's a more research.
|
01:33:12
|
|
Type scenario.
|
01:33:18
|
|
Tunnel basin.
|
01:33:20
|
|
Umm.
|
01:33:22
|
|
How to sell ranch?
|
01:33:23
|
|
2106.
|
01:33:28
|
|
39 E.
|
01:33:32
|
|
Uh.
|
01:33:35
|
|
We acquired that it went to Treasurers deed in 18 and we acquired it in 18-4 Floodway.
|
01:33:37
|
|
Purchase.
|
01:33:44
|
|
That's that.
|
01:33:47
|
|
Right in the middle of the Creek, Yeah.
|
01:33:48
|
|
OK. Yeah. Cause that black over to the right that's that's the private, that's private.
|
01:33:50
|
|
Again, Tunnel Creek. This is on the north side.
|
01:33:58
|
|
Umm.
|
01:34:03
|
|
1039 A.
|
01:34:05
|
|
And we acquired it in 2005. It it sticks in the Tunnel Creek.
|
01:34:10
|
|
Umm.
|
01:34:16
|
|
And.
|
01:34:19
|
|
Portion of that is where that **** is.
|
01:34:20
|
|
I think that's right.
|
01:34:23
|
|
Kind of at the starting point of that.
|
01:34:25
|
|
Uh, this is.
|
01:34:29
|
|
If on Tunnel Creek Trail, there's one Rd. that has a split down the middle of it and the drainage ditch.
|
01:34:30
|
|
Well, this is that ditch.
|
01:34:37
|
|
Ewing Trail right away issues.
|
01:34:41
|
|
Right away, perfection.
|
01:34:44
|
|
Again, this we just actually recently purchased, so we had sufficient right away for construction of the Tunnel Creek Bridge.
|
01:34:49
|
|
Yeah, that.
|
01:35:05
|
|
Ohh this one R.
|
01:35:09
|
|
2/01/14.
|
01:35:11
|
|
You are Desert Rose Drive.
|
01:35:15
|
|
Another one of the.
|
01:35:19
|
|
Uh.
|
01:35:21
|
|
Communities Growth by Minor Land Vision and.
|
01:35:23
|
|
Needed access.
|
01:35:27
|
|
And so that was the leftover piece, and somehow we ended up with it.
|
01:35:31
|
|
If you have any questions.
|
01:35:36
|
|
59 U2 106.
|
01:35:39
|
|
That's a female buyout in 2011.
|
01:35:43
|
|
No.
|
01:35:48
|
|
So real close to.
|
01:35:48
|
|
Tunnel Creek.
|
01:35:51
|
|
Westminster Abbey, The Tower.
|
01:35:55
|
|
No.
|
01:35:58
|
|
Moving on to Mr. Klein's section of the world.
|
01:36:00
|
|
Work.
|
01:36:05
|
|
It covers quite a bit of land.
|
01:36:06
|
|
Ian Hayden.
|
01:36:08
|
|
Umm.
|
01:36:10
|
|
1/01/07.
|
01:36:12
|
|
We acquired that in 2009.
|
01:36:14
|
|
I couldn't identify a specific purchase purpose for it.
|
01:36:20
|
|
There wasn't a Treasurer speed that we converted.
|
01:36:24
|
|
So somehow.
|
01:36:28
|
|
Umm.
|
01:36:31
|
|
We did a quick claim deed.
|
01:36:33
|
|
For the property.
|
01:36:35
|
|
Why? I don't know.
|
01:36:38
|
|
So we're going to get into some properties in Hayden that.
|
01:36:40
|
|
For whatever reason, Supervisor Dawson purchased them.
|
01:36:44
|
|
And I think if I'm not mistaken, there's gonna be about seven of them, so OK.
|
01:36:49
|
|
Well.
|
01:36:54
|
|
Was her term inclusive of 2009?
|
01:36:56
|
|
I don't know.
|
01:37:00
|
|
Yeah.
|
01:37:01
|
|
I I don't know if that my head.
|
01:37:02
|
|
But there there's a couple that were acquired.
|
01:37:04
|
|
Ohh so one 01/07/05.
|
01:37:10
|
|
Again, another 2009 quick claim, probably part of that cluster. 7 properties.
|
01:37:16
|
|
This was the.
|
01:37:22
|
|
Laundromat.
|
01:37:24
|
|
Mm-hmm.
|
01:37:28
|
|
So this sets on the corner right just up from the police.
|
01:37:30
|
|
Police departments on the other corner.
|
01:37:35
|
|
OK.
|
01:37:39
|
|
Ohh 1107162 again.
|
01:37:42
|
|
Part of that 2009.
|
01:37:46
|
|
Quickly.
|
01:37:48
|
|
963.
|
01:37:52
|
|
This one was moderately interesting. I could not find a single bead related to it.
|
01:37:55
|
|
The folder was empty in the assessor's office.
|
01:38:02
|
|
Well, that's where.
|
01:38:05
|
|
Or then say go back to title company and do a title search. Because there's gotta be one somewhere. Be one somewhere, yeah.
|
01:38:07
|
|
It it may go back to the original subdivision and.
|
01:38:13
|
|
Nothing ever happened.
|
01:38:16
|
|
Um.
|
01:38:18
|
|
Ohh 9125A.
|
01:38:23
|
|
Again, 2009.
|
01:38:25
|
|
Eight and Nine's were that.
|
01:38:29
|
|
Hotel.
|
01:38:34
|
|
Yeah, that got torn down.
|
01:38:35
|
|
Couldn't tell you what the counties intent was to do. We did it.
|
01:38:38
|
|
That was one of those owned by the state and care of us. So we turn into a parking lot Ramadas right there.
|
01:38:44
|
|
And that was tore down and everything cleaned up by a grant.
|
01:38:51
|
|
That Kathy worked really hard on to get that all that done, so.
|
01:38:54
|
|
Mr. Chairman, Sears clients, 200 Dawson served.
|
01:38:59
|
|
On the category scores from 2005 to 2012. Alright, so nine is it? Yep.
|
01:39:03
|
|
Again.
|
01:39:14
|
|
10110 oh 29 I have a feeling that's.
|
01:39:15
|
|
Same part of the time frame, probably more clean up.
|
01:39:20
|
|
So on those properties that Supervisor Dawson purchased back then?
|
01:39:26
|
|
Umm.
|
01:39:31
|
|
Try them if I'm wrong, Kathy, but I think they were all thinned up except for those two.
|
01:39:32
|
|
The one that doesn't that that you can't find title on.
|
01:39:38
|
|
I think.
|
01:39:41
|
|
And the laundromat. Everything else was cleaned up.
|
01:39:42
|
|
And the way I understand it is our people are the ones that cleaned it up, so.
|
01:39:46
|
|
So it's just basically vacant property.
|
01:39:51
|
|
And as you see in size wise not on very big, but they're all right there on streets and.
|
01:39:54
|
|
Yeah, there's no reason for us to own any of it. It's right there, to be honest with you.
|
01:39:59
|
|
And I don't know if the City of Hayden would be interested in in any of them or not.
|
01:40:05
|
|
I don't know.
|
01:40:10
|
|
Yeah, they're definitely inside their incorporated limits.
|
01:40:14
|
|
So moving on to Star Valley.
|
01:40:19
|
|
This is part of Right Away from Moonlight Drive. Sounds like a great candidate for transfer.
|
01:40:23
|
|
The town.
|
01:40:30
|
|
This one here, doesn't it also have some drainage with it as well?
|
01:40:39
|
|
They're going through part of it, Yes Sir. The Creek runs right along the left edge, so the.
|
01:40:43
|
|
Moonlight Drive runs across the right edge and the Creek runs through on the left edge.
|
01:40:50
|
|
Is it? In the past I've had conversations with some folks about that particular piece of property and what we were going to do
|
01:40:55
|
|
with it.
|
01:40:58
|
|
Not meaning they wanted they they were wanting us to do something that drainage was the issue.
|
01:41:02
|
|
Cleaned it out, brother. Yeah.
|
01:41:08
|
|
But umm.
|
01:41:11
|
|
We acquired it in 1982 and the town of Star Valley didn't incorporate till 2005 so.
|
01:41:12
|
|
They may be interested in it, I don't know.
|
01:41:18
|
|
At least for Rd. maintenance purposes.
|
01:41:22
|
|
Uh, here's Walters Lane that is.
|
01:41:27
|
|
Between the fire department and 260.
|
01:41:30
|
|
Same story.
|
01:41:34
|
|
KJ Radio AM 12 again. We inquired it in 95.
|
01:41:36
|
|
Probably 4 Walters Lane.
|
01:41:43
|
< |