BOS Work Session
Bookmark list
Loading...
Transcript
| Yeah, this one's good to go, so. | 00:00:00 | |
| Good morning, everyone. | 00:00:04 | |
| We'll call this meeting together Tuesday, March 26th. It's 10:00. | 00:00:06 | |
| And all three supervisors are present and I would like to. | 00:00:12 | |
| Have us all stand and. | 00:00:17 | |
| Lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance. | 00:00:19 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. | 00:00:23 | |
| One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. | 00:00:31 | |
| OK, well, prayer. Today we have a. | 00:00:37 | |
| Sort of a work session. | 00:00:41 | |
| And. | 00:00:44 | |
| One item. | 00:00:47 | |
| Item 2A It's information. | 00:00:50 | |
| Yes. | 00:00:53 | |
| Who's that? Yes, for the rest, I just wanted to state that I am here, present on the phone. Justice Abelli was the county | 00:00:55 | |
| attorneys office. | 00:01:00 | |
| Oh, OK. Great. All right. Thank you. | 00:01:05 | |
| Information. | 00:01:09 | |
| Yeah, thank you. Information discussion regarding Gila County's proposed Town Site Act purchase for the Buckhead Mesa Landfill | 00:01:11 | |
| expansion. We have Melanie and Homero here this morning. | 00:01:16 | |
| First of all, supervisors as well together and what we're looking for here, we're looking to buy properties mansion and we want to | 00:01:51 | |
| get really quick in front of the acreage and what to do with that. | 00:02:00 | |
| This is the outline. I like to do that when you see whether. | 00:02:14 | |
| We're going through and answer the questions as to what, where, why, when and how. And we're going to listen to the previous | 00:02:19 | |
| agency session, the status of the business of national and then I have a timeline of what this kind of looks like. | 00:02:25 | |
| The translator is nothing. | 00:02:33 | |
| Excuse me a second. | 00:02:36 | |
| What's not working? | 00:02:38 | |
| We don't need to start over, do we? Do we need to start over? | 00:02:46 | |
| OK. So going through the the, the timeline, of course you have the purpose of this recession, the status of the Buckhead Mesa | 00:02:49 | |
| landfill and then a timeline that we put together regarding the Townside Act purchase. The Townside Act purchase is a very lengthy | 00:02:57 | |
| process. We're looking at anywhere from three to five years and that's considered an expedited Town Side Act purchase. | 00:03:05 | |
| And then we have some land use options that not only deal with the Buckhead Mesa landfill, but the roads division and then a | 00:03:13 | |
| possibility of other. | 00:03:18 | |
| County services being able to utilize this land purchase. | 00:03:24 | |
| And then we very lastly, we have the land appraisal and then acquisition cost for all of the land that we're going to talk about. | 00:03:29 | |
| So we kind of went over the purpose and um. | 00:03:41 | |
| So we just want to provide information to the board regarding the Buckhead Mesa landfill expansion and then how it relates to the | 00:03:44 | |
| acquisition of land. We've met before and we've talked about the expansion needs for the peace and landfill and. | 00:03:51 | |
| It's under a. | 00:04:00 | |
| It's under a Forest Service special use permit. The Forest Service is getting out of the landfill business and they no longer want | 00:04:04 | |
| to have landfills on their land. And so they're really encouraging us to purchase the land and then expand the landfill that way. | 00:04:11 | |
| And what we're looking at is 100 year landfill. So in the words of my stepfather, if you fill the plan, you plan to fail. So we're | 00:04:17 | |
| really looking out in long term and and we're looking at 100 years. | 00:04:24 | |
| Part of the purchase is going to include our existing landfill. | 00:04:31 | |
| The Lychee ponds, they were leading to the landfill and then the current. | 00:04:35 | |
| Road yard material pit that we've been using over the years that's been under that special use permit. | 00:04:41 | |
| So those things are required in purchasing the land and then? | 00:04:47 | |
| We would be able to buy additional land for the expansion. | 00:04:51 | |
| The microphone is working. | 00:05:01 | |
| So the status of the Buckhead Mesa landfill, so again we sit on a 51 acre of US Forest Service special use permit. That permit | 00:05:04 | |
| expired in 2019, but they're allowing us to continue to pay those fees and use that permit while we undergo the. | 00:05:12 | |
| The town side out to purchase. | 00:05:21 | |
| We did a fly over in 2022 and it was determined at that time that we have capacity until. | 00:05:23 | |
| 2032, so that would have been 10 years at the time. It's now 2024, so we're looking at. | 00:05:30 | |
| Eight years. | 00:05:37 | |
| Of landfill capacity. | 00:05:38 | |
| So we and feel free to speak up. This is a work session so. | 00:05:41 | |
| Melanie, when you refer to cubic yards and tons, are they the equivalent? They are not the equivalent. I believe it's. | 00:05:45 | |
| .6. | 00:05:55 | |
| For every cubic yard. | 00:05:57 | |
| Has when they calculate into tons. So cubic yards and tons, there's a math problem that you have to do to figure it out. Yeah. And | 00:06:00 | |
| you've done that. And so you've calculated 2052, correct. OK. | 00:06:06 | |
| We also do fly overs every year and that fluctuates depending on, you know, how much stress we bring in. Sometimes it goes up and | 00:06:13 | |
| sometimes it goes down of what we would anticipate bringing in, of course, when we moved trash from. | 00:06:20 | |
| Globe over to Buckhead. We probably ate up about 6 months of. | 00:06:27 | |
| That those cubic yards, because we're bringing in double the. | 00:06:33 | |
| The time edge for that time. | 00:06:36 | |
| So our fly over this year would put us at a more accurate capacity rate. So it's, you know, we were at 8 years, now we're at 7 | 00:06:39 | |
| 1/2. | 00:06:43 | |
| So looking at this timeline. | 00:06:52 | |
| So our very first item is April 24, that's me here today and. | 00:06:55 | |
| It says the POS resolution for a correction include the landfill material, pit yard and other county facilities. So we're just | 00:07:01 | |
| having this conversation and letting you know what the options are. And then not until September, which is about 6 months from | 00:07:07 | |
| now, would we actually need to provide a letter to the Forest Service. | 00:07:13 | |
| That would say, OK, this is these are the exact acreages and this is the exact map that we want to purchase. | 00:07:19 | |
| Even though the purchase is in about three to five years out, there's a lengthy process. They call it the 52 Step to the Town Side | 00:07:26 | |
| act, but there's really 55 and so. | 00:07:32 | |
| This is just one of the very. | 00:07:39 | |
| Few beginning steps of that 55 step process. | 00:07:42 | |
| And then we go through the lands granted in 2025 and then we need to build begin the landfill design. | 00:07:46 | |
| Complete the landfill design and then we're hoping to begin construction in 2027. | 00:07:54 | |
| Question yes, on complete landfill design. | 00:08:01 | |
| Do you have an engineering cost of that design? Yes. | 00:08:07 | |
| Yes. And it would be factored into our landfill engineers that we renew yearly. That would be an item that would be on their their | 00:08:13 | |
| contract for that income and that would be an. | 00:08:19 | |
| In 2025. | 00:08:27 | |
| So, yeah, we wouldn't incur that cost till 2025. | 00:08:29 | |
| A little bit about the Town Site Act Purchase. | 00:08:35 | |
| It was established in 1958 and there was a little. | 00:08:40 | |
| OK. So the community values must outweigh the public objective. So anything we were going to do on this land, we would have to let | 00:08:47 | |
| them know ahead of time when we do send that letter in September. And then they would say yes or no that they're OK with us doing | 00:08:54 | |
| that on the land. And and that would be the purpose of us purchasing that land. | 00:09:00 | |
| So, umm. | 00:09:07 | |
| We can purchase up to 640 acres. | 00:09:08 | |
| And. | 00:09:12 | |
| For the landfill, we only need 220, about 220 acres. We have on our acquisition cost of 223 acres, but we can buy up to 640 with | 00:09:15 | |
| the Townside Act purchased. And that's why I wanted to come talk to you because there's a lot, there's many more things that we | 00:09:22 | |
| can do with this land and there's several areas that are very flat and. | 00:09:30 | |
| And conducive to other. | 00:09:39 | |
| Activities, Melanie. With that 220 acres in mind, we have 51 acres in existence now. | 00:09:41 | |
| So do we have to buy that 51 acres as well? Yes, we do. At the same rate as the rest? Yes. Can that be negotiated? | 00:09:48 | |
| It so part of the town Site Act purchases that it has to be purchased for fair market value. So when they did the, we had a | 00:09:57 | |
| preliminary appraisal done on the property and they have to view it as there's no Rd. there's no utilities, there's no landfill, | 00:10:06 | |
| there's no electricity. So the purchase of that land is probably quite lower than it. | 00:10:15 | |
| Would be if they were to take those things into consideration. | 00:10:24 | |
| And vice versa. So if it had a Lambda on it, you know there's liability there, but it you know it wouldn't have a road or | 00:10:28 | |
| electricity, so and it's a pretty reasonable. | 00:10:34 | |
| Dollar amount when we get into the acquisition cost but. | 00:10:40 | |
| It's there's only a few appraisers that are qualified to do a Town Site Act appraisal and we were given a list and we used one of | 00:10:47 | |
| those appraisers on that list and it's the dollar amount that they came up with. So the dollar amount is 3600 per acre. | 00:10:55 | |
| So, but what I'm getting at is we are going to assume the liability for that landfill that is under special use permit. | 00:11:03 | |
| Whereas we could cancel the special use permit and walk away and the foresters would have that liability right, we would still be | 00:11:10 | |
| under obligation to close the landfill. | 00:11:15 | |
| But once a landfill, always a landfill. And So what I'm getting at is, in my opinion, and it's just my opinion, but. | 00:11:22 | |
| It seems like with that liability, we're going to take on that 51 acres because we're going to take it. There's no doubt about | 00:11:30 | |
| that. But I could see paying at 3600 for the 220, but not for the 51 that's already active. | 00:11:36 | |
| You see what I'm saying I do. There's no benefit there for that 51 acre, right, and the acquisition cost for. | 00:11:43 | |
| For the property as a whole. So the appraiser, the actual land appraised at 1800 dollars. | 00:11:52 | |
| Per acre. | 00:11:59 | |
| And then part of the acquisition costs are the UMM. | 00:12:01 | |
| All of the environmental studies that we have to do, so we factored that in, in order to split it up through the departments. | 00:12:07 | |
| But we wouldn't be doing any environmental testing on. | 00:12:14 | |
| The 51 acres, so I mean. | 00:12:18 | |
| Kind of. It's only $1800 an acre for that property, but when you do an environmental study, it's. | 00:12:22 | |
| For the entire property, and it's one. | 00:12:30 | |
| Dollar amount and so we kind of factored it into all of the acres but really no environmental studies are going to be done on the. | 00:12:33 | |
| I think to make it real simple in my point of view is that they ought to just sign over the 51 acres to us and then we pay for the | 00:12:39 | |
| 300 or 220 for a total of 320, right. And I think that they would be happy to do that except for the way that the town side Act | 00:12:44 | |
| purchased was written. | 00:12:49 | |
| They're not allowed to do it because it's it's based on fair market value and they have. | 00:12:57 | |
| All these rolls and rags, where it has to be, it has to be viewed as there. We haven't done anything because we're the ones that | 00:13:02 | |
| did it to the land we've had, we have. | 00:13:06 | |
| Meetings with them every month and we've actually argued this point and and those were their answers. | 00:13:12 | |
| Yeah, it amazes me. They could even come up with a fair market value on that 50. | 00:13:20 | |
| Be honest with you, I know. Yeah. And it was established in 1958. So it was like a long time ago where they decided that. | 00:13:25 | |
| Yeah, cool. | 00:13:33 | |
| So this is a complete list of all 55 steps. I'd say we're probably in the first. | 00:13:43 | |
| Four or five, It's really small writing and. | 00:13:50 | |
| This process again is going to take three to five years. It's an expediting process and I feel like the department actually has to | 00:13:55 | |
| be obsessed with this to keep it going. So we have a Gantt chart where. | 00:14:01 | |
| We're taking the 52 steps and put them into milestones to where we're not dropping the ball on anything and it it's. | 00:14:08 | |
| It takes a lot of attention and a lot of meetings to make sure that this goes smoothly over the next three to five years. Because | 00:14:15 | |
| there are so many steps. A lot of these steps need to be performed by the county, and then a lot of these steps are done by the | 00:14:21 | |
| Forest Service. | 00:14:26 | |
| OK, so this is the map that we currently have. We're going to make a few revisions to this map. | 00:14:37 | |
| We're going to move the property all the way to the highway. | 00:14:47 | |
| For this triangle. And then this is kind of where we want your input as well, to let us know what would be feasible for other | 00:14:52 | |
| county departments, if that's something that you chose to do. And again, we would want that we need to have that letter to the | 00:14:58 | |
| Forest Service by September. | 00:15:03 | |
| So some of the land use options for this property are the 100 year landfill a road yard. | 00:15:09 | |
| Material pit, so we have an existing material pit and it's just about empty. So we would need a new one and then other county | 00:15:16 | |
| services and so that would be. | 00:15:20 | |
| Determined by. | 00:15:26 | |
| You guys, what the other county services would be? | 00:15:28 | |
| I know there was a lot of ideas thrown around. | 00:15:33 | |
| Maybe the Sheriff's Department could use it. Or community development. It's flatland. | 00:15:38 | |
| I think there's a lot of uses for this area. | 00:15:45 | |
| If you look on the map, the red area that has the lines in it, that's all flatland up against the highway and that's where we're | 00:15:48 | |
| proposing the other county services would be the the odd shape in the back would be the landfill and. | 00:15:55 | |
| That land is flat as well. | 00:16:04 | |
| And now the exciting part, the acquisition cost, So these acquisition costs are broke down. So we have our 223 acres for the | 00:16:10 | |
| landfill and that's going to last us 100 years. | 00:16:16 | |
| Each user has a portion of the road that they would purchase because we need the road to get all the way out to the landfill. | 00:16:24 | |
| There's a hearth total, so that's the Highway User User revenue fund. So the roads department could have. | 00:16:31 | |
| A road yard, a material pit, and then they would need to purchase their existing material pit that was under the 51. | 00:16:39 | |
| Acres. | 00:16:46 | |
| Of the special use permit and then I. | 00:16:48 | |
| The options for other county services? There's about 172 acres available. | 00:16:52 | |
| So part of those acquisition costs, there are some archaeological sites there. We've had several meetings with the Forest Service. | 00:17:03 | |
| They brought in their archaeology team and then we had a contractor with us to kind of explain what's going on with those ARK | 00:17:10 | |
| sites. And so some of those would need to be remediated and then they would also have meetings with I think it's. | 00:17:17 | |
| 11 tribes or 13 tribes. | 00:17:25 | |
| So they would have to have those meetings and then determine what our course of action would be for those art sites. | 00:17:29 | |
| And all of that is, is what you see in the acquisition cost. So we're estimating it would be about double the 1800 in order to get | 00:17:36 | |
| all of those testing and remediations done. | 00:17:42 | |
| It's a lot, but it's I think it's, I mean I know that it's doable and that we can we can make it happen so. | 00:17:52 | |
| This would be the most marvelous landfill in Gila County, yes, Yes, I'm excited. So why are we not going for more than the 200 and | 00:17:59 | |
| some acres? Is there a reason other just the cost? | 00:18:06 | |
| We did. | 00:18:15 | |
| The math to determine what we would need for 100 years and we're really just planning out 100 years for the landfill also the way | 00:18:18 | |
| that the landscape is. | 00:18:23 | |
| We're using the land that would be most feasible for the landfill and there's a lot of creeks in between those areas. And so | 00:18:30 | |
| that's why when you see the map, you see you know this area is flat and and usable and then there's a Creek and then this land | 00:18:37 | |
| would be great for landfill. And in order to expand a landfill, it needs to come up to the existing landfill. And if we were to | 00:18:44 | |
| put a landfill close to the road then we would be citing a new landfill which is a whole another process that would need 80 like. | 00:18:51 | |
| Way more approval. Like there's so many more processes to citing a new landfill than expanding a landfill. | 00:19:00 | |
| So the well, the well site, is that part of our purchase or is that going to remain out of? | 00:19:08 | |
| The water tank or the water tank, the bottom of the drainage there, there's a well site, yes. So that is part of the purchase. And | 00:19:15 | |
| that was one of the reasons that we were really excited about needing to buy that material pit is because we have a natural source | 00:19:22 | |
| of water there that we'd be able to use for the road department and dust patrol at the landfill. | 00:19:29 | |
| 10 How are we going to pay for it? | 00:19:37 | |
| So. | 00:19:43 | |
| I know how I'm going to paper my portion and her has the funding to to buy their portion as well. We have three to five years for | 00:19:48 | |
| other county services and determine what their their budgeting. | 00:19:54 | |
| Forecast looks like over the next three to five years and that's really. | 00:20:03 | |
| Where you guys come in to find the funding for the other the 172 acres? | 00:20:07 | |
| That answer your question? No, That's how we're going to pay for it. It'll it'll come, right. So I think to go back to why we're | 00:20:14 | |
| only getting 3:20 and 6:40 is. | 00:20:20 | |
| Is in my mind because we are reaching out. | 00:20:26 | |
| To that 100 year mark with the 3:20. | 00:20:30 | |
| Quite honestly, I won't be around here when it's time to discuss that again, right? | 00:20:33 | |
| You know that's up to somebody else, and who knows what will change by then as well. You know where things are going. Also, it's | 00:20:37 | |
| the cost. | 00:20:41 | |
| You know we'll be looking at a big chunk change to reach out there and get 640. | 00:20:45 | |
| And so. | 00:20:51 | |
| So I think that's that's one thing we need to consider is that and how much money we can spend and if the three pointing will get | 00:20:52 | |
| us. | 00:20:56 | |
| That far, I honestly don't know why we would want to think about any further right now. | 00:21:00 | |
| It's very logical. | 00:21:07 | |
| Yeah, I. | 00:21:11 | |
| Unless you can take on a partner. | 00:21:13 | |
| For for infrastructure. | 00:21:16 | |
| Yeah. And you know the infrastructure pretty good possibility there really. You know, if you could take on a partner and we need | 00:21:20 | |
| what we need for 100 years, but we got a chance to get 640 and for service to let us take on a partner. | 00:21:26 | |
| Which gives us X amount of acres for a partner for development. | 00:21:33 | |
| Because everybody knows we don't. | 00:21:38 | |
| Have a lot of living space and. | 00:21:41 | |
| But I may be getting a way out of bound. | 00:21:44 | |
| Yes, of course, Chairman and board members. | 00:21:50 | |
| The reason we're here is that it gets your input and I just wanted to share a couple of points. | 00:21:55 | |
| That are pertinent to what we're doing here? | 00:22:02 | |
| This is a one time opportunity. | 00:22:04 | |
| OK. And it is between Pine strawberry and payment? | 00:22:06 | |
| And and there could be an opportunity for the county services and county administration. | 00:22:10 | |
| To have some kind of facility out there, it could be a jail, but sheriff, it could be. | 00:22:15 | |
| The Road Yard. We could move the road yard from Pine Strawberry into this area, except for instance, and sell that of the property | 00:22:21 | |
| that we have in Pine Strawberry. | 00:22:25 | |
| So there is not a firm plan for the county services and administration. | 00:22:30 | |
| The opposite to that is this is a one time opportunity. | 00:22:36 | |
| The work that we go through. | 00:22:40 | |
| For staff will be similar whether we buy 320 acres or 640 acres. | 00:22:41 | |
| The cost for the environmental assessment. | 00:22:47 | |
| Will not necessarily double. | 00:22:51 | |
| But it'll be a fraction of the money that we spent for 320. It is up to a certain extent, acre based. | 00:22:53 | |
| But it's not entirely A2 base, the cost for E8. The cost for EA, by the way, is an estimate. | 00:23:01 | |
| And so we doubled the the estimate of an appraised cost, we double it and we won't know that a that exact cost. So we start | 00:23:07 | |
| actually working that particular issue. | 00:23:14 | |
| And one of one of the early steps is to do a survey and find out how much archaeological. | 00:23:20 | |
| Stuff is in there and then we generally try to gerrymander to stay out of it as much as we can. | 00:23:26 | |
| And So what the map that you saw earlier was was you didn't see a rectangle, you saw different shapes and we're trying to stay out | 00:23:32 | |
| of. | 00:23:35 | |
| Areas that aren't flat, aren't usable, etc. We get a lot of good out of this we there is no landfill operation in. | 00:23:39 | |
| Eva County. | 00:23:49 | |
| Other than Gila County itself? | 00:23:51 | |
| OK. And there is no plan for somebody to come and build a landfill, so if. | 00:23:54 | |
| Later on, we have to expand the landfill here in Globe. We may turn it into a transfer station and haul to the patient if it turns | 00:24:00 | |
| out to be more feasible than than in buying more property and expanding the landfill here. So this represents an opportunity for | 00:24:06 | |
| us to get land at a reasonable cost. | 00:24:12 | |
| Granted, it's not in the middle of one town or another. OK. And then the question to the board is? | 00:24:19 | |
| What? What? What's your opinion of this opportunity? | 00:24:26 | |
| And the so the opportunity to purchase land at a reasonable cost is a good thing. | 00:24:32 | |
| But the other thing is. | 00:24:38 | |
| This land would have to be used for county purposes. | 00:24:40 | |
| A county administration and county services. | 00:24:43 | |
| Thing or the things that we talked to the floor service. | 00:24:46 | |
| When we stray from that and we ask them what about housing they they say no it's not about housing it's about county services and | 00:24:50 | |
| county administration and and I heard something about partners and it can the partners could be a city or a talent OK and cities | 00:24:58 | |
| and towns all for gold gold and and we could invite them to someone to partner with us from a city or a town if we wanted to. | 00:25:06 | |
| But from what we're working on is county services and county administration type of things. | 00:25:15 | |
| The idea of. | 00:25:25 | |
| Why do we have to pay for the landfill and for the? | 00:25:29 | |
| The material pit that we have there, we posted that question early on. | 00:25:35 | |
| And and that's the Torque said you have to pay. That's all there is to it and we can bring it up again. | 00:25:39 | |
| One of one of the things about the landfill, though, is we don't walk away. | 00:25:44 | |
| From the landfill closure cost. | 00:25:50 | |
| Just because if you return that property back to the Forest Service, actually we obtain 2 costs, then one is to close it for the | 00:25:53 | |
| agreement that we have with ADEQ, because the agreement is not between the four service and ADEQ, it's between the county and | 00:25:59 | |
| ADEQ. | 00:26:04 | |
| So we retain the cost. | 00:26:10 | |
| And on top of that, we have to return the land to whatever the floor service tells that we have to return it once we're done with | 00:26:12 | |
| the special use permit. So we're not walking away from that. | 00:26:17 | |
| And and and we did have a debate with him on why we have to buy it, OK. | 00:26:22 | |
| So that we were not successful, we can keep trying and we can do it at different levels. | 00:26:27 | |
| And more power to us if we can avoid the cost of that. One of the things that that that it's a minimal environmental cost for the | 00:26:33 | |
| landfill area. It's already been disturbed and dug 34 feet. | 00:26:39 | |
| So we should see almost no cost with that area from an environmental standpoint. I just wanted to share those kind of things to to | 00:26:46 | |
| add more to your to your thoughts. | 00:26:51 | |
| So if you forget your. | 00:26:56 | |
| Home Arrow. | 00:26:58 | |
| I don't think you'll ever get away from not paying for that existing landfill. You know, as much as it makes sense that we | 00:27:01 | |
| shouldn't, it just should be thrown in on the deal and we're not going to get away from it. | 00:27:06 | |
| But. | 00:27:11 | |
| On this transaction, this conveyance. | 00:27:13 | |
| What if someday in the future? | 00:27:18 | |
| 25 years from. | 00:27:20 | |
| The county decides they don't want in landfill business anymore. | 00:27:22 | |
| Would we be able to? | 00:27:26 | |
| Lease it? Another company to run it? Put it on contract, out on contract to do it, Or is it always going to have to be? | 00:27:28 | |
| The county that has. | 00:27:38 | |
| Sole ownership and responsibilities to this. | 00:27:40 | |
| That's a good question and I honestly don't know the answer to that. We have to, we have to review that with Matt and the floor | 00:27:44 | |
| service. | 00:27:48 | |
| A lot of things can change in 25 years exactly. | 00:27:54 | |
| And umm. | 00:27:58 | |
| That that land will eventually be ours when we buy it. | 00:28:00 | |
| But we buy it under the commitment of county services and administrative. | 00:28:04 | |
| So we just we just need to run that by. | 00:28:09 | |
| Right now get an answer for that. | 00:28:12 | |
| Might be similar to Pleasant Valley. | 00:28:17 | |
| Well then, but there is a little bit of a difference because we are going to purchase this land. | 00:28:20 | |
| Where the vet center is just a straight conveyance, no, no monetary transaction at all. Mr. Chairman, Director is fine. | 00:28:25 | |
| As long as it's used for the purposes that we identify can't use for housing, we've already asked that question been identified. | 00:28:35 | |
| But. | 00:28:43 | |
| As long as it's used for landfill, whether we own and operate and manage the landfill or have somebody else do it. | 00:28:45 | |
| I can't imagine that there's going to be too much. | 00:28:52 | |
| Too many problems with that will be a problem. I can't either, James, but I'm just saying that might be something we want to | 00:28:56 | |
| clarify because. | 00:29:00 | |
| I'm not 100% sure on that either. Absolutely. | 00:29:04 | |
| Yeah, Supervisor Humphrey. | 00:29:10 | |
| My 2 senses. | 00:29:13 | |
| Let's get what we need for 100 years. | 00:29:15 | |
| And if we fight that dragon, that's probably a good enough fight from where I sit today. | 00:29:18 | |
| I you know I got partner and more land and it's like. | 00:29:25 | |
| Back up, Tim. Do we can't use it for housing. That's just. | 00:29:29 | |
| Let's just try to get done what we need to get done and I appreciate you looking ahead. | 00:29:33 | |
| As staff has. | 00:29:39 | |
| Because if we've got. | 00:29:41 | |
| You know, a few years left. | 00:29:43 | |
| And we can get this bought before we run out of room. | 00:29:45 | |
| I think that's a great thing because we know what it's like to have trouble with landfills. So I appreciate you looking ahead. | 00:29:50 | |
| And so I. | 00:29:57 | |
| Pretty much, you know I'm I'm, I'm good with with 100 year landfill. I mean I really AM and I don't see trying to reach further | 00:29:59 | |
| than that because. | 00:30:04 | |
| Finances and things for more than 100 years. | 00:30:09 | |
| We've got a lot of things that we can work. | 00:30:12 | |
| That are a little closer to home so. | 00:30:15 | |
| I appreciate what you've done and I think what you've. | 00:30:18 | |
| Put out and and the fact that. | 00:30:21 | |
| You're set up for 100, reaching for 100 years. I'm good with that. | 00:30:24 | |
| Chairman and you can verify normally if you have but. | 00:30:29 | |
| By my map what they've got told here. | 00:30:34 | |
| For the. | 00:30:37 | |
| Work works and general county services is 501. | 00:30:39 | |
| .4 acres. So it's. | 00:30:43 | |
| Pushing up against that 640. | 00:30:47 | |
| And having gone out there and walked the site. | 00:30:49 | |
| In the in the red area. | 00:30:52 | |
| Were identified here. | 00:30:54 | |
| And over there for public works and general use. | 00:30:57 | |
| Those are really the flat areas. You get into other areas not identified, the topography becomes more difficult to manage and so | 00:31:00 | |
| it's really what Melanie and Homer have identified are the usable. | 00:31:06 | |
| Portions of that site. | 00:31:13 | |
| And to. | 00:31:15 | |
| Even at 1600 or 1800 or 3600. | 00:31:18 | |
| If it's not usable, it's just not usable. | 00:31:22 | |
| And uh. | 00:31:25 | |
| So what? None is identified. | 00:31:27 | |
| Is what can be functional for the county. | 00:31:30 | |
| So I don't know if you can answer this, Melanie, but homeroom can. How many acres do we own in Pine for a road yard? | 00:31:34 | |
| I would have to make. | 00:31:45 | |
| 3 acres, OK, not very much. | 00:31:47 | |
| But worth a whole lot. | 00:31:54 | |
| Huh. | 00:31:56 | |
| It is well, well, with things going on through my mind too is that how active is our Rd. yard and pine right now? I mean we're | 00:31:58 | |
| short on staffing up there so. | 00:32:03 | |
| Well, I mean how? | 00:32:09 | |
| How used is it I guess? | 00:32:11 | |
| Now, if they were before, but they're traveling, they're fine, because we're short. We're short handed, but. | 00:32:15 | |
| We need to solve the issue of. | 00:32:21 | |
| Our positions and our vacancies overtime. | 00:32:26 | |
| And we've made a little bit of headway into that, but we need to solve that and I foresee in the future having. | 00:32:29 | |
| Folks working on a pine strawberry. | 00:32:35 | |
| Again, there's no we have a lot of rope we maintain up there. | 00:32:38 | |
| And we're up there all the time. | 00:32:43 | |
| And to be more efficient, we need to have our folks have that be their beauty station and not Star Valley. | 00:32:44 | |
| And we need to go back to that or closer to it. | 00:32:52 | |
| The landfill is halfway that that area, that outside ACT area is halfway. | 00:32:55 | |
| It's five, 6-7 miles away from from pine. | 00:33:02 | |
| So let me ask you this, Homer. Is this something I'm just throwing out? Ideas. That's all I'm doing. | 00:33:04 | |
| But if let's say for example, we were to close the Pine Strawberry Rd. yard. | 00:33:10 | |
| Move it to the Buckhead Mesa, would we have the opportunity to put workforce housing on on that site for for our county employees? | 00:33:15 | |
| See, that's one of the things. One of the reasons we can't attract anyone is because nobody can afford to live up there. | 00:33:25 | |
| Or impatient in general. | 00:33:30 | |
| But if in fact we were able to build 3 or 4. | 00:33:32 | |
| Units for workforce housing. | 00:33:37 | |
| That could solve a huge issue in our department. | 00:33:40 | |
| We will again touch that base with Aperture. | 00:33:45 | |
| The her best interested in some land out there to purchase some land out there there's first of all there's water. There's a pond. | 00:33:50 | |
| We everybody uses that pond for water. The landfill and and the road yards use it. | 00:33:56 | |
| We want to continue to utilize the material for rope there and whether we do it on that, on that area that we're digging in right | 00:34:03 | |
| now or whether we move over to an area that that we would identify. | 00:34:10 | |
| We will still be interested in not just buying the existing material fit, but additional area as well. | 00:34:18 | |
| From her, from a her stand. | 00:34:26 | |
| It would be beneficial for we could park vehicles there if nothing else. | 00:34:29 | |
| But I think there will be the opportunity to move the road yard. | 00:34:34 | |
| Into this area in future. | 00:34:39 | |
| There's no, there's no reason why we wouldn't be able to do that. | 00:34:42 | |
| I think it'd be something to really look at. We are scattered out so bad it's it's just crazy. But but on top of that, you know, | 00:34:45 | |
| for the issues that we have for. | 00:34:50 | |
| For employees to be able to be up there, housing is the the top of the list. | 00:34:56 | |
| And so that would be something, Melanie. | 00:35:02 | |
| We talked about money a while ago. | 00:35:06 | |
| So when you're looking at us here as a board? | 00:35:09 | |
| And on your back. | 00:35:13 | |
| Is where I mean the grand total is 1,000,008. | 00:35:15 | |
| Right, yes. | 00:35:22 | |
| And so you've got how much of that already covered? | 00:35:25 | |
| That 800,000. | 00:35:30 | |
| And then so 800,000 would be the landfill total? | 00:35:32 | |
| That would come out of our. | 00:35:35 | |
| Our fund balance from the money that we're able to save over the next three to five years and then the herb total would come out | 00:35:39 | |
| of her funds. I checked with finance to see if that's something that's covered under her, if I don't know a whole lot about her, | 00:35:44 | |
| but I did. | 00:35:49 | |
| Do my due diligence. And they said yes, that that total would be covered by her. OK, so you would. | 00:35:55 | |
| You've got about $800,000, little over $800,000 covered out of 1,000,008. | 00:36:02 | |
| So we'll be looking at coming up with $1,000,000, roughly 619,000. | 00:36:07 | |
| OK, 619,000. | 00:36:14 | |
| OK, so. | 00:36:17 | |
| I'm just asking this question. | 00:36:20 | |
| OK, You guys are an enterprise fund. | 00:36:22 | |
| We're going to take 600, six, $100,000 out of whatever to balance that to be able to pay for it. | 00:36:25 | |
| So does that mean we lease that back to you and you eventually pay us off that 600,000 or how does that work? You know my my hope | 00:36:31 | |
| would be that whichever department. | 00:36:36 | |
| Utilize that land, they would pay you back for it. So if the Sheriff's Department wanted to build a jail, that would come out of | 00:36:42 | |
| the Sheriff's Department or its community development needed to build a building or if we were able to do the housing that would | 00:36:46 | |
| come out of. | 00:36:50 | |
| The fund, the her fund, if that's, I don't know if that would be something covered under her, but whatever fund. | 00:36:55 | |
| That the roads department would utilize. Yeah. And I, I get that. But right now, presently as we're sitting here talking, we have | 00:37:03 | |
| no idea whether another department or whatever would be interested in doing anything. They're all covered right there in Payson, | 00:37:09 | |
| although kind of cramped and crowded in places, but overall they're there. So I'm just thinking ahead and throwing this out there. | 00:37:15 | |
| Not that I for one, would be worried about $600,000 going towards the landfill because it all goes towards the services of our | 00:37:24 | |
| constituents. | 00:37:28 | |
| But I know that that sits there. When we do something, we pay. | 00:37:33 | |
| Enterprise funds back, We pay our funds back, we balance money, we juggle money, we do all these. So that's why I'm asking if we | 00:37:38 | |
| throw in 600,800 thousand, $1,000,000 whatever it is. | 00:37:44 | |
| Where is that? Are we just going to do that for one or is it going to be worked out in the future? Because I don't really see any | 00:37:52 | |
| departments going out there for a very long time. | 00:37:56 | |
| I just don't. And a lot of it is due to the cost of of. | 00:38:02 | |
| Infrastructure moving? | 00:38:06 | |
| All of that as well. I just and times are kind of getting tougher and tougher. So the landfill doesn't have A use for that | 00:38:08 | |
| flatland close to the highway. We saw it as an opportunity. I so Gila County as a whole is only 3% privately owned land. As you | 00:38:15 | |
| know. The rest is either mines or it's owned by the Forest Service. I think it's like 2.8 million acres that's owned by the Forest | 00:38:21 | |
| Service. And so this would be an opportunity for the county to acquire land. | 00:38:27 | |
| Against that 2.8 million acres and but and that's exactly why we're here is to get your input and hear your thoughts because I | 00:38:36 | |
| don't know what any other department has as far as funding and so I wanted to put it out there. | 00:38:43 | |
| And we haven't contacted any other departments to say, hey, do you need land. I know that you guys have a broad idea of what's | 00:38:51 | |
| really going on with Hill County as a whole. So I appreciate that. See, I think overall, there's no doubt we don't want to miss | 00:38:56 | |
| the opportunity to get a hold of this land. I think that's first and foremost in my mind. | 00:39:02 | |
| We have the opportunity to do this because tomorrow is absolutely right. This is one one shot deal and who knows what will happen | 00:39:08 | |
| later down the road, so we don't want to miss that. | 00:39:12 | |
| But I'm just throwing that out there. It's like, yeah, I'm sure. | 00:39:17 | |
| You know, I'm not speaking for the board, but I'm sure as a county will come up with some way to make this happen. | 00:39:21 | |
| But but we need to think about balancing it too. Or or we can just. | 00:39:26 | |
| What about later or whatever? I don't know, but so I just wanted to ask you. | 00:39:31 | |
| Nominee. Good presentation, so. | 00:39:39 | |
| I personally think that we need to do whatever we need to do. So if 303 twenty, whatever it is, we need to get it, we need to buy | 00:39:44 | |
| it, we need to act on it, we need to start doing it and. | 00:39:50 | |
| All of that we should purchase everything that we feel we need. | 00:39:57 | |
| And no more than that. | 00:40:02 | |
| Because there's be senseless to purchase a drainage if we can't use it for anything. | 00:40:04 | |
| So I know that our material pit up there for Buckhead material. | 00:40:09 | |
| Is getting to a point where we may no longer be able to. | 00:40:17 | |
| Get more. | 00:40:22 | |
| Is this expansion property wise going to include more areas with material? | 00:40:24 | |
| Yes. | 00:40:31 | |
| And our hope is to be able to excavate material ourselves for the expansion. So part of the expansion hearing globe we paid a | 00:40:33 | |
| company to come in. But if we are able to acquire the land before we do our actual construction, we can even pull that material | 00:40:40 | |
| out and use it and stockpile it as we go. So there's there's a lot of land there that would be used for a material pit. | 00:40:48 | |
| Well, sounds like you've done a lot of planning. So I trust the planning is your presentation is this is the. | 00:40:56 | |
| This is what you recommend. | 00:41:03 | |
| And you've answered all the questions that I have supervisor hurt for anymore. I'm good. | 00:41:05 | |
| I just think well pursue the 3:20 and go on with it and I think all these side board discussions like the road yard and pine and | 00:41:13 | |
| strawberry that needs to be looked at as well when we start doing this and. | 00:41:18 | |
| Take the money out of that property there and put it into something else. So. | 00:41:25 | |
| On that site so, but I I think it's a good plan and it has a lot of options and. | 00:41:29 | |
| And I know that we'll be talking about some more. | 00:41:34 | |
| You know, Yep, yes Sir. | 00:41:37 | |
| I do have a question. You said 320, but. | 00:41:41 | |
| By the numbers of the acres, there were over 500 acres total. And then? | 00:41:46 | |
| To get the that little slivers over there adjacent to the highways another 20. So we're looking at acquiring about 520 acres. | 00:41:52 | |
| Yeah, I I I believe what? | 00:42:02 | |
| I believe what? | 00:42:05 | |
| Mr. Chairman And the supervisors were saying is that they're not interested in producing additional round that we don't have any | 00:42:07 | |
| for at this time, correct. Well, I think was this whole discussion based around the 320, are we talking 64? You got 323.4, a | 00:42:13 | |
| hundred and four 5.9 and 172.1 acres identified in this chart like this. | 00:42:20 | |
| Which falls to 501.4. There's some, as was stated, there's some a sliver right here adjacent to the highway that we'll go ahead | 00:42:28 | |
| and pick up. So we have all that highway print another 20 acres. So that would lead me to believe that we're talking about | 00:42:34 | |
| acquiring about 520 acres. | 00:42:40 | |
| So I'd want to identify that good point discussion. Good point, James. And if you look at the bottom left hand corner, says | 00:42:46 | |
| proposed Buckhead Mason landfill expansion. | 00:42:51 | |
| 320 acres. | 00:42:57 | |
| Underneath that on the agenda item. | 00:42:59 | |
| Yeah. | 00:43:01 | |
| So the landfill expansion? | 00:43:06 | |
| You're right. | 00:43:14 | |
| Right here on the bottom of the map of your. | 00:43:17 | |
| That's 320 acres. | 00:43:22 | |
| OK. And I believe that has it's 320 if you don't factor in the? | 00:43:25 | |
| 172. | 00:43:33 | |
| But that is probably a typo. The whole map is not for here in 20 it's somewhere around 500. | 00:43:35 | |
| OK, so we're looking at. | 00:43:43 | |
| A little over 500 acres, yes. So the 500 acres, umm. | 00:43:45 | |
| Is what totals the $1.8 million. | 00:43:51 | |
| OK. OK. And that would include the 100 year landfill, the stuff that we need for the roads department and then that additional 172 | 00:43:53 | |
| acres that would be used for additional county services if we can get over 500 acres in in on that site for 1.8, I'm all in favor. | 00:44:01 | |
| That's just. I mean I'll just make it simple. | 00:44:11 | |
| And we'll worry about uses later, but. | 00:44:14 | |
| Oh yeah. | 00:44:19 | |
| It's probably going to be a little bit more. Like I said, there's a sliver over there again, Jason Highway, so about 520. | 00:44:20 | |
| Total acres, yeah. We do want to move the map that triangle over to the highway. So we would have access to the highway for | 00:44:28 | |
| whatever services we were to put there. So it would be a few markers here, correct? | 00:44:34 | |
| Truck stop. Quick stop. | 00:44:41 | |
| Melanie mentioned 52 steps. | 00:44:45 | |
| Tom Thie Deck and even though the floor service is very cooperative and they're being very flexible, we submitted a map early on. | 00:44:49 | |
| There were 320 acres. | 00:44:54 | |
| And that's where the source that was the first map that we and we told them this is just tentative now and they said. | 00:44:59 | |
| We'll, we'll start working with this, but you guys have flexibility. | 00:45:08 | |
| You want to grow that, or if you want to diminish that? | 00:45:12 | |
| But there will come a point in time when they'll say, OK, you got to make up your mind, Healer County, we're going to keep moving | 00:45:15 | |
| on the 52 steps and part of the the moving forward is we need to hire the archaeologists to get moving and we need to know whether | 00:45:20 | |
| it's 520 acres or 320 acres. | 00:45:25 | |
| And and part of what today is. | 00:45:30 | |
| To get your guidance on which direction do we think we're headed now, exactly the shape of the map and exactly whether it's 520 | 00:45:34 | |
| acres. | 00:45:37 | |
| We can make it be 500 acres if we want to. We'll shave a little bit off the herb side, will shave a little bit off the General | 00:45:42 | |
| Services side. We know we want to be by the highway. | 00:45:47 | |
| We want to have highway from that. We know that now. We know where the flat areas are, we've identified them. | 00:45:52 | |
| We know where the material fit can be and where the water source is and we've identified that. So but it's not whether it's 520 or | 00:45:59 | |
| 500 acres, it's whether it's 500 acres or 300 acres. | 00:46:05 | |
| OK. That I think that's the question. | 00:46:12 | |
| For the board is would you would you rather have more or would you rather have less? | 00:46:15 | |
| And with that we can we can make headway with the work that we need to do. | 00:46:19 | |
| With the archaeologists. | 00:46:24 | |
| For me, Yep. I would say we want them more. Yeah. | 00:46:26 | |
| That's just where I'm going. I mean, we may have to reach out there and be kind of creative for the final dollar amount or | 00:46:30 | |
| whatever, but but we're not going to get another opportunity like this. | 00:46:34 | |
| Whether whether it's. | 00:46:40 | |
| Next year, 10 years, we're all sitting here. Not this will be a good thing for the county going forward as far as I can see. | 00:46:42 | |
| And so if we can pull that off for 1,000,008 if I learned 20, whatever's on that map. | 00:46:48 | |
| I personally am good with that. | 00:46:54 | |
| I am as well. | 00:46:58 | |
| I am as well unanimous. | 00:47:00 | |
| Do you have any questions for us to clear up anything? | 00:47:03 | |
| No, I don't. I I I appreciate. | 00:47:07 | |
| You explaining that again because I missed that on the map as well, so I'm. | 00:47:11 | |
| I'm happy. Well, I'm feeling better that we've got a couple more. | 00:47:17 | |
| A couple hundred more acres, yeah, Yeah. I mean, I knew that it was 500, but I I apologize for not making that clear. So we're | 00:47:21 | |
| really close to a full section. That's that's good. I like that so. | 00:47:28 | |
| And originally we were thinking it was going to be like $10,000 an acre based on what Land's going for. And so when the appraisal, | 00:47:34 | |
| appraisal came back, I was pleasantly surprised and I think it's a really good idea. | 00:47:40 | |
| So yeah. | 00:47:51 | |
| Anything else, guys? No. OK. Thank you, Melanie. Thank you. Yeah, thank you. | 00:47:52 | |
| OK. So let's move on to item three call to the public. | 00:47:59 | |
| Anyone here in Globe? | 00:48:04 | |
| No. Anyone in Payson. | 00:48:05 | |
| OK, Cassandra, are we good? | 00:48:10 | |
| OK, how many people on YouTube today? | 00:48:14 | |
| 15 great. | 00:48:18 | |
| OK, so let's start with our presentations. Item number 4. | 00:48:20 | |
| Let's start with. | 00:48:24 | |
| Our County Manager men love after further today, Mr. Chairman. | 00:48:27 | |
| OK, Supervisor, hopefully I'm good today. Supervisor Klein, a few things I had. | 00:48:30 | |
| Well, we did small county CSA the other night really went well. | 00:48:38 | |
| Thanks to Sherry and everyone for putting on that dinner, James. That was really good. | 00:48:43 | |
| After that I had a meeting in Young with James and the departments looking at building sites for the vet center. That went well. | 00:48:48 | |
| Saturday, last Saturday at Town Hall, there's about 40 to 50 people. We had our County Attorney, Brad Beauchamp, Sadie Bingham and | 00:48:57 | |
| Homero was there. And thanks again to all you guys for being there. | 00:49:03 | |
| Then I was. | 00:49:11 | |
| Asked to to fill in or run for Richard Lund's position on WIR. | 00:49:14 | |
| And so I'm going to start, start with that, start working. I already have started working on that and I'll be pursuing that | 00:49:21 | |
| position. That's the voting position on WIR. There's two positions, one's non voting and ones voting. | 00:49:27 | |
| The way I understand it, in the past they've both been both positions and have been voting, but I'm more interested in the one for | 00:49:34 | |
| sure, so I'm going to take that on. I also attended a. | 00:49:40 | |
| Coalition. | 00:49:47 | |
| Meeting to announce in New Mexico and I was put back in there as Chairman on that that board too so. | 00:49:49 | |
| So with that Mr. Chair, that is all I have today. Thank you. | 00:49:56 | |
| Thank you for your willingness to serve on the WIR. | 00:50:01 | |
| Yeah. Last Thursday after our dinner, we had a regular board meeting with the CSA and Richard was there and had a. | 00:50:09 | |
| Fairly emotional and truthful. | 00:50:17 | |
| Talk about how he's going to step away and. | 00:50:24 | |
| Pursue other things. And so that was good. And so your name did come up in that meeting as a possible nominee. | 00:50:28 | |
| OK. And then. | 00:50:34 | |
| So last Wednesday I met. Before our dinner. I met with Representative David Cook, David Marshall, Senator David. | 00:50:37 | |
| There's a lot of David's over there if Gowan and I rub down this little with Senator Ken Bennett. | 00:50:45 | |
| And spoke with Wendy Rogers that night a little bit, so just expressing things that are. | 00:50:52 | |
| Concern for our county water issues, different things like that. | 00:51:00 | |
| So that was good. We had a good dinner. A lot of compliments on that dinner, so. | 00:51:05 | |
| And it was really good. I'm glad to see that we were all there. | 00:51:09 | |
| I have planned uh. | 00:51:14 | |
| The Northern Heila County preseason fire meeting. It is going to be April 4th and that is for. | 00:51:15 | |
| That's by invite only kind of thing for all of our fire. | 00:51:23 | |
| Departments, etcetera that need to get together, talk about the upcoming fire season. So. | 00:51:29 | |
| I know you generally you're planning on being there, OK, that generally is the way it is and so everyone welcome of course so. | 00:51:37 | |
| And that's all I have so. | 00:51:47 | |
| If there's nothing else, gentlemen, then I will adjourn the meeting. | 00:51:49 | |
| Thank you, Sir. | 00:51:55 |